235 Pine St

235 Pine St is a 25-story building in Downtown San Francisco with 98% of its floor area within daylight reach of a facade. This screen estimates 248 homes and scores it 100 out of 100 for office-to-residential conversion suitability.

CA-11 · Screened 2026-10-12 · Strong candidate

Build a free conversion planCheck its numbers, lay out its homes and get a two-page PDF. Free.

Where 235 Pine St is

Its block in Downtown San Francisco, drawn from San Francisco's own building outlines and street centerlines.

266 Bush St: scores 100 out of 1001 Bush St: scores 100 out of 100465 California St: scores 100 out of 100130 Bush St: scores 100 out of 100200 Bush St: scores 100 out of 100351 California St: scores 100 out of 100220 Bush St: scores 100 out of 100401 California St: scores 100 out of 100225 Bush St: scores 99 out of 100240 Montgomery St: scores 99 out of 100160 Sansome St: scores 95 out of 10031 Front St: scores 95 out of 100475 California St: scores 94 out of 100191 Battery St: scores 93 out of 100155 Sansome St: scores 92 out of 1002 Battery St: scores 92 out of 100234 Bush St: scores 92 out of 100340 Pine St: scores 91 out of 100369 Pine St: scores 91 out of 100100 Battery St: scores 90 out of 100111 Battery St: scores 90 out of 10098 Battery St: scores 88 out of 100433 California St: scores 84 out of 100140 Battery St: scores 83 out of 100201 California St: scores 83 out of 100100 Pine St: scores 81 out of 10040 Battery St: scores 68 out of 100425 Market St: scores 55 out of 100101 California St: scores 35 out of 1001001001001001009592929291919090888468100BATTERY STPINE STSANSOME STBUSH STLEIDESDORFF STCENTURY PLEXCHANGE PLTREASURY PLMARKET STN100 ftDowntown San Francisco
Suitability score
0–29
30–49
50–69
70–100
  • Already housing
  • Not screened
  • 235 Pine St
235 Pine St and the 1,000 ft of Downtown San Francisco around it. The streets are drawn at the width of the right-of-way they run down, sidewalks included, and named, and every building on these blocks is drawn. What is left open and stippled is neither: a surface lot, a plaza or a vacant parcel. The screened buildings are colored by the ramp above, the same one the district map uses, carry their score, and each is a link to its own page. Each casts a shadow as long as its measured height lets it, so towers stand out from the low buildings around them; the unscreened buildings have no measured height and cast none. 235 Pine St is outlined in its own score color at the outline it covers at ground level. Its windowless core is hatched. The inset places it among every building the screen covers.
37 ftAA50 ftDaylit 98%Core 189 sq ft
Floor plan: 98% of each floor sits within daylight reach of a facade. The shading is daylight, darkest at the windows and gone 35 ft in. The hatched area is windowless core: 189 sq ft per floor that must be renovated but can never be rented as an apartment. The dimension marks the deepest interior point, 37 ft from the nearest window. A–A is where the section beside it is cut.
Windowless core25 floors25 ft
Section A–A: cut across the depth of the plate, through the middle of the core. Daylight reaches 35 ft in from every facade, fading as it goes, and the hatched stripe left between the lit edges is floor that gets converted and can never be rented: 189 sq ft on the floor the screen scores, and 4,540 sq ft over 24 residential floors. The shaded ground floor is converted like the rest and counted as no homes.

This building does not pencil on its own, but a modeled RESIDE Act grant would close the gap if the building qualified for one.

Every floor carries 189 sq ft of windowless core — area that must be gutted, seismically braced and sprinklered but can never be rented as an apartment. Across 24 residential floors that is 4,540 sq ft of cost carrying no revenue.

Modeled conversion metrics for 235 Pine St, 2026-10-12.

Suitability scoreStrong candidate100 / 100
Storiesfrom 312 ft LiDAR (2010) height ÷ 12 ft floor-to-floor25
Floor plateper floor, from the city footprint9,900 sq ft
Daylight efficiencyshare within 35 ft of a facade98%
Deepest interior pointviability threshold is 80 ft37 ft
Windowless coreper floor — renovated but never rentable189 sq ft
Estimated homesat 750 sq ft average248
Conversion cost$405/sq ft all-in on 237,589 sq ft$96.2M
Gap before grantshortfall against completed value$5.5M
Modeled RESIDE grantat the statutory per-award cap$10.0M
BuiltSan Francisco's own record of the construction year1991
ZoningFinancial District/South BeachC-3-O
Opportunity Zonenot in a 2018 designated tractNo

The plan: window line, shape and floor rhythm

42 ft of exterior wall for each home the screen estimates — enough for two- and three-bedroom homes across the plan.

The typical floor has 432 ft of exterior wall, and across 24 residential floors the building carries 10,374 ft of it in total, divided among the 248 homes this screen estimates.

Its plate is moderately compact at 0.67: a squarish plan, with enough perimeter for a conventional double-loaded corridor. How window line and plate shape are measured.

At the model’s 750 sq ft average, the plan works out at about 10.3 homes per floor, repeated on every residential floor, since this building's outline does not change as it rises.

Why 235 Pine St scores 100 out of 100

Daylight efficiency 100, Interior depth 100, Scale 100, Finance 100 — each out of 100, then weighted.

Score components for 235 Pine St. Points are the subscore times its weight.

ComponentSubscoreWeightPoints
Daylight efficiency98% of the floor area within 35 ft of a facade, scored from 40% up to 90%10045%45.0
Interior depthdeepest interior point 37 ft from a facade, scored from 80 ft down to 40 ft10025%25.0
Scale248 estimated homes, scored from 0 up to 15010015%15.0
Financecompleted value covers conversion cost with 5% to spare, which tops out the component10015%15.0

Every component scores at or near full marks, so nothing in the geometry or the pro-forma is holding this one back — daylight efficiency carries the most weight of the four.

Built in 1991

San Francisco records this building as going up in 1991, which puts it in the modern stock.

As a rule, newer systems and better structure, but usually built deep and sealed for office use, and rarely cheap enough to buy at a price that lets a conversion pencil. That is the era’s general tendency rather than a finding about this building — the model reads an outline and a height, and can see nothing inside — but it is the first thing an architect would want to know, and it colours how much confidence the 98% daylight figure above deserves.

What the conversion would cost

$405 per square foot all-in across 237,589 sq ft of converted floor, or $96.2M in total — about $388K for each of the 248 homes.

All-in cost per square foot for 235 Pine St: base cost plus the code work a change of use triggers.

Base conversion cost$260/sq ft
Seismic retrofit (change of use)$45/sq ft
Plumbing risers to every unit$40/sq ft
Operable windows and glazing$30/sq ft
Additional egress stair$18/sq ft
Fire sprinklers (NFPA 13R)$12/sq ft
All-in$405/sq ft

That cost is charged across every converted square foot, including the 4,540 sq ft of windowless core, which has to be gutted, seismically braced and sprinklered like the rest of the building and then earns nothing. Against it the model sets a completed value of $366K a home, which for 248 homes is $90.8M.

What would have to be true

A $5.5M gap before any grant, which the modeled $10.0M closes. What would reopen it soonest: completed value per home 5% down.

The shortfall before any grant is $5.5M. Closing it from the value side means each of the 248 homes finishing at $388K rather than the $366K the model assumes — 6% more. Closing it from the cost side means getting all-in cost down from $405 to $382 per square foot.

A modeled RESIDE grant of $10.0M moves that threshold to $348K a home. That is below the assumed value, which is why this building counts as unlocked by the grant — subject to it qualifying under the law's vacant-and-abandoned test, which this data cannot show.

Each of these, moved on its own, would be enough to undo that for 235 Pine St:

Single-assumption flip points for 235 Pine St, each holding the other three at their defaults.

Completed value per homethe binding constraint — the least this building would need5% downto $348K
Circulation efficiency5% downto 76%
Average unit size5% upto 790 sq ft
Conversion cost per square foot7% upto $279/sq ft

All four are sliders in the survey, where 235 Pine St re-scores against your own numbers.

How it compares in Downtown San Francisco

235 Pine St ranks 1st of the 205 buildings screened here, against a median score of 87.

Its floor plate is better lit than 67% of them, and shallower than 69% of them at its deepest interior point. On size it is the 69th largest by estimated homes. The full survey of all 205 buildings ranks and maps every one of them, and the list by address links each to its own page.

Within Financial District/South Beach and the C-3-O zone

1st of 165 in Financial District/South Beach, 1st of 88 zoned C-3-O — the comparison that shares its rules, rents and streets.

San Francisco places 165 of the screened buildings in Financial District/South Beach. 235 Pine St ranks 1st of them against a median score of 88, the top score in the group. 121 score 70 or more, their median deepest interior point is 47 ft from a facade against this building’s 37 ft, and together they would hold an estimated 40,456 homes. The group’s top scorer is 870 Market St, at 100.

88 of the screened buildings are zoned C-3-O. 235 Pine St ranks 1st of them against a median score of 89, the top score in the group. 76 score 70 or more, their median deepest interior point is 44 ft from a facade against this building’s 37 ft, and together they would hold an estimated 21,444 homes. The group’s top scorer is 266 Bush St, at 100.

Its nearest match in size: 430 California St

The screened building closest to 235 Pine St in converted floor area is 430 California St: 228,999 sq ft over 21 stories, against 237,589 sq ft over 25 here.

235 Pine St scores 100 to its 91, and with the size held roughly equal most of that lead comes from interior depth: 100 out of 100 here, 72 there (deepest interior point 51 ft from a facade, scored from 80 ft down to 40 ft). On the money they part ways: 430 California St falls short even with the modeled grant, while 235 Pine St pencils only with the modeled RESIDE grant. The two stand about 700 ft apart.

Would it qualify for a RESIDE Act grant?

The model awards 235 Pine St $10.0M, on the assumption it qualifies. Whether it does, no published dataset can say.

That figure assumes the building meets the Act’s vacant-and-abandoned test, which turns on code-enforcement and receivership records no city publishes.

It does not sit in a 2018 designated Opportunity Zone, so it would not draw that Section 201 priority.

Other buildings screened near 235 Pine St

The 4 closest the screen also covers, from 90 ft away. They are the colored outlines on the plan at the top of this page.

  • 160 Sansome St
    17 stories · 92% daylit · 147 estimated homes · scores 95/100 (Strong candidate)
    about 90 ft away
  • 111 Battery St
    8 stories · 100% daylit · 47 estimated homes · scores 90/100 (Strong candidate)
    about 170 ft away
  • 130 Bush St
    14 stories · 100% daylit · 186 estimated homes · scores 100/100 (Strong candidate)
    about 170 ft away
  • 98 Battery St
    7 stories · 90% daylit · 68 estimated homes · scores 88/100 (Strong candidate)
    about 270 ft away

A screen, not a feasibility study, from outlines and heights rather than plans: the method and how to correct a figure. If you know this building’s interior, you know what this model cannot see.