222 Kearny St

222 Kearny St is a 6-story building in Downtown San Francisco with 100% of its floor area within daylight reach of a facade. This screen estimates 50 homes and scores it 90 out of 100 for office-to-residential conversion suitability.

CA-11 · Screened 2026-10-12 · Strong candidate

Build a free conversion planCheck its numbers, lay out its homes and get a two-page PDF. Free.

Also addressed as 224 Kearny St and 226 Kearny St: San Francisco’s address records place all 3 on this one footprint.

Where 222 Kearny St is

Its block in Downtown San Francisco, drawn from San Francisco's own building outlines and street centerlines.

266 Bush St: scores 100 out of 10041 Montgomery St: scores 100 out of 100101 Montgomery St: scores 100 out of 100350 Bush St: scores 100 out of 100582 Market St: scores 100 out of 100225 Bush St: scores 99 out of 100246 Sutter St: scores 90 out of 100425 Bush St: scores 89 out of 10044 Montgomery St: scores 89 out of 100123 Kearny St: scores 87 out of 100295 Bush St: scores 83 out of 1001 Claude Ln: scores 76 out of 100100 Kearny St: scores 68 out of 100100 Montgomery St: scores 65 out of 100100100908989766590CLAUDE LNTRINITY STSUTTER STBUSH STMONTGOMERY STMARK LNKEARNY STHARDIE PLN100 ftDowntown San Francisco
Suitability score
0–29
30–49
50–69
70–100
  • Already housing
  • Not screened
  • 222 Kearny St
222 Kearny St and the 1,000 ft of Downtown San Francisco around it. The streets are drawn at the width of the right-of-way they run down, sidewalks included, and named, and every building on these blocks is drawn. What is left open and stippled is neither: a surface lot, a plaza or a vacant parcel. The screened buildings are colored by the ramp above, the same one the district map uses, carry their score, and each is a link to its own page. Each casts a shadow as long as its measured height lets it, so towers stand out from the low buildings around them; the unscreened buildings have no measured height and cast none. 222 Kearny St is outlined in its own score color at the outline it covers at ground level. The inset places it among every building the screen covers.
31 ftAA50 ftDaylit 100%
Floor plan: 100% of each floor sits within daylight reach of a facade, with no dead core at all. The shading is daylight, darkest at the windows and gone 35 ft in. The dimension marks the deepest interior point, 31 ft from the nearest window. A–A is where the section beside it is cut.
Ground floor · no homesDaylit6 floors25 ft
Section A–A: cut across the depth of the plate, through the middle of the core. Daylight reaches 35 ft in from every facade, and here it meets in the middle: the plate is thin enough that no floor is left windowless. The shaded ground floor is converted like the rest and counted as no homes.

This building does not pencil on its own, but a modeled RESIDE Act grant would close the gap if the building qualified for one.

This footprint has no windowless core at all: every point on the floor plate is within 35 ft of a facade, which is unusual and is the main reason it scores as well as it does.

Modeled conversion metrics for 222 Kearny St, 2026-10-12.

Suitability scoreStrong candidate90 / 100
Storiesfrom 138 ft LiDAR (2010) height ÷ 12 ft floor-to-floor6
Floor plateper floor, from the city footprint9,540 sq ft
Daylight efficiencyshare within 35 ft of a facade100%
Deepest interior pointviability threshold is 80 ft31 ft
Windowless coreper floor — renovated but never rentable0 sq ft
Estimated homesat 750 sq ft average50
Conversion cost$405/sq ft all-in on 47,701 sq ft$19.3M
Gap before grantshortfall against completed value$1.0M
Modeled RESIDE grantbelow the statutory cap$3.0M
BuiltSan Francisco's own record of the construction year1987
ZoningFinancial District/South BeachC-3-O
Opportunity Zonenot in a 2018 designated tractNo

The plan: window line, shape and floor rhythm

48 ft of exterior wall for each home the screen estimates — enough for two- and three-bedroom homes across the plan.

The typical floor has 480 ft of exterior wall, and across 5 residential floors the building carries 2,401 ft of it in total, divided among the 50 homes this screen estimates.

Its plate is moderately compact at 0.52: a squarish plan, with enough perimeter for a conventional double-loaded corridor. How window line and plate shape are measured.

At the model’s 750 sq ft average, the plan works out at about 10.0 homes per floor, repeated on every residential floor, since this building's outline does not change as it rises.

Why 222 Kearny St scores 90 out of 100

Daylight efficiency 100, Interior depth 100, Scale 33, Finance 100 — each out of 100, then weighted.

Score components for 222 Kearny St. Points are the subscore times its weight.

ComponentSubscoreWeightPoints
Daylight efficiency100% of the floor area within 35 ft of a facade, scored from 40% up to 90%10045%45.0
Interior depthdeepest interior point 31 ft from a facade, scored from 80 ft down to 40 ft10025%25.0
Scale50 estimated homes, scored from 0 up to 1503315%5.0
Financecompleted value covers conversion cost with 10% to spare, which tops out the component10015%15.0

Most of what it earns comes from daylight efficiency, and what holds it back most is scale, at 33 out of 100: 50 estimated homes, scored from 0 up to 150.

Built in 1987

San Francisco records this building as going up in 1987, which puts it in the late-modern stock.

As a rule, typically the hardest to convert: the deepest plates of any era, large central cores, and floor-to-floor heights tight enough that running residential drainage under a ceiling can be the thing that ends a project. That is the era’s general tendency rather than a finding about this building — the model reads an outline and a height, and can see nothing inside — but it is the first thing an architect would want to know, and it colours how much confidence the 100% daylight figure above deserves.

What the conversion would cost

$405 per square foot all-in across 47,701 sq ft of converted floor, or $19.3M in total — about $386K for each of the 50 homes.

All-in cost per square foot for 222 Kearny St: base cost plus the code work a change of use triggers.

Base conversion cost$260/sq ft
Seismic retrofit (change of use)$45/sq ft
Plumbing risers to every unit$40/sq ft
Operable windows and glazing$30/sq ft
Additional egress stair$18/sq ft
Fire sprinklers (NFPA 13R)$12/sq ft
All-in$405/sq ft

That cost is charged across every converted square foot, including the circulation and service area that earns nothing directly. Against it the model sets a completed value of $366K a home, which for 50 homes is $18.3M.

What would have to be true

A $1.0M gap before any grant, which the modeled $3.0M closes. What would reopen it soonest: circulation efficiency 10% down.

The shortfall before any grant is $1.0M. Closing it from the value side means each of the 50 homes finishing at $386K rather than the $366K the model assumes — 6% more. Closing it from the cost side means getting all-in cost down from $405 to $384 per square foot.

A modeled RESIDE grant of $3.0M moves that threshold to $326K a home. That is below the assumed value, which is why this building counts as unlocked by the grant — subject to it qualifying under the law's vacant-and-abandoned test, which this data cannot show.

Each of these, moved on its own, would be enough to undo that for 222 Kearny St:

Single-assumption flip points for 222 Kearny St, each holding the other three at their defaults.

Circulation efficiencythe binding constraint — the least this building would need10% downto 72%
Average unit size11% upto 830 sq ft
Completed value per home11% downto $326K
Conversion cost per square foot16% upto $302/sq ft

All four are sliders in the survey, where 222 Kearny St re-scores against your own numbers.

How it compares in Downtown San Francisco

222 Kearny St ranks 72nd of the 205 buildings screened here, against a median score of 87.

Its floor plate is better lit than 100% of them, and shallower than 81% of them at its deepest interior point. On size it is the 175th largest by estimated homes. The full survey of all 205 buildings ranks and maps every one of them, and the list by address links each to its own page.

Within Financial District/South Beach and the C-3-O zone

60th of 165 in Financial District/South Beach, 42nd of 88 zoned C-3-O — the comparison that shares its rules, rents and streets.

San Francisco places 165 of the screened buildings in Financial District/South Beach. 222 Kearny St ranks 60th of them against a median score of 88. 121 score 70 or more, their median deepest interior point is 47 ft from a facade against this building’s 31 ft, and together they would hold an estimated 40,456 homes. The group’s top scorer is 870 Market St, at 100.

88 of the screened buildings are zoned C-3-O. 222 Kearny St ranks 42nd of them against a median score of 89. 76 score 70 or more, their median deepest interior point is 44 ft from a facade against this building’s 31 ft, and together they would hold an estimated 21,444 homes. The group’s top scorer is 266 Bush St, at 100.

Its nearest match in size: 735 Market St

The screened building closest to 222 Kearny St in converted floor area is 735 Market St: 46,601 sq ft over 6 stories, against 47,701 sq ft over 6 here.

The two land within a few points of each other — 90 here, 90 there — so at this size the screen reads them as much the same prospect. On the money they sit in the same place: each pencils only with the modeled RESIDE grant. The two stand about 1,300 ft apart.

Would it qualify for a RESIDE Act grant?

The model awards 222 Kearny St $3.0M, on the assumption it qualifies. Whether it does, no published dataset can say.

That figure assumes the building meets the Act’s vacant-and-abandoned test, which turns on code-enforcement and receivership records no city publishes.

It does not sit in a 2018 designated Opportunity Zone, so it would not draw that Section 201 priority.

Other buildings screened near 222 Kearny St

The 4 closest the screen also covers, from 290 ft away. They are the colored outlines on the plan at the top of this page.

  • 1 Claude Ln
    9 stories · 82% daylit · 111 estimated homes · scores 76/100 (Strong candidate)
    about 290 ft away
  • 425 Bush St
    6 stories · 100% daylit · 37 estimated homes · scores 89/100 (Strong candidate)
    about 290 ft away
  • 101 Montgomery St
    28 stories · 100% daylit · 290 estimated homes · scores 100/100 (Strong candidate)
    about 300 ft away
  • 41 Montgomery St
    24 stories · 100% daylit · 354 estimated homes · scores 100/100 (Strong candidate)
    about 320 ft away

A screen, not a feasibility study, from outlines and heights rather than plans: the method and how to correct a figure. If you know this building’s interior, you know what this model cannot see.