201 Grant Ave

201 Grant Ave is a 11-story building in Downtown San Francisco with 100% of its floor area within daylight reach of a facade. This screen estimates 88 homes and scores it 94 out of 100 for office-to-residential conversion suitability.

CA-11 · Screened 2026-10-12 · Strong candidate

Build a free conversion planCheck its numbers, lay out its homes and get a two-page PDF. Free.

Also addressed as 207 Grant Ave, 209 Grant Ave, 200 Post St and 210 Post St: San Francisco’s address records place all 5 on this one footprint.

Where 201 Grant Ave is

Its block in Downtown San Francisco, drawn from San Francisco's own building outlines and street centerlines.

60 Maiden Ln: scores 91 out of 100246 Sutter St: scores 90 out of 10028 Geary St: scores 90 out of 10025 Kearny St: scores 89 out of 100312 Sutter St: scores 89 out of 100245 Post St: scores 89 out of 10050 Maiden Ln: scores 88 out of 100123 Kearny St: scores 87 out of 100101 Kearny St: scores 87 out of 100150 Post St: scores 82 out of 1001 Claude Ln: scores 76 out of 100100 Kearny St: scores 68 out of 1009190898988878294SUTTER STPOST STMAIDEN LNCAMPTON PLSTOCKTON STGRANT AVEN100 ftDowntown San Francisco
Suitability score
0–29
30–49
50–69
70–100
  • Already housing
  • Not screened
  • 201 Grant Ave
201 Grant Ave and the 1,000 ft of Downtown San Francisco around it. The streets are drawn at the width of the right-of-way they run down, sidewalks included, and named, and every building on these blocks is drawn. What is left open and stippled is neither: a surface lot, a plaza or a vacant parcel. The screened buildings are colored by the ramp above, the same one the district map uses, carry their score, and each is a link to its own page. Each casts a shadow as long as its measured height lets it, so towers stand out from the low buildings around them; the unscreened buildings have no measured height and cast none. 201 Grant Ave is outlined in its own score color at the outline it covers at ground level. The inset places it among every building the screen covers.
30 ftAA50 ftDaylit 100%
Floor plan: 100% of each floor sits within daylight reach of a facade, with no dead core at all. The shading is daylight, darkest at the windows and gone 35 ft in. The dimension marks the deepest interior point, 30 ft from the nearest window. A–A is where the section beside it is cut.
No homesDaylit11 floors25 ft
Section A–A: cut across the depth of the plate, through the middle of the core. Daylight reaches 35 ft in from every facade, and here it meets in the middle: the plate is thin enough that no floor is left windowless. The shaded ground floor is converted like the rest and counted as no homes.

This building does not pencil on its own, but a modeled RESIDE Act grant would close the gap if the building qualified for one.

This footprint has no windowless core at all: every point on the floor plate is within 35 ft of a facade, which is unusual and is the main reason it scores as well as it does.

Modeled conversion metrics for 201 Grant Ave, 2026-10-12.

Suitability scoreStrong candidate94 / 100
Storiesfrom 162 ft LiDAR (2010) height ÷ 12 ft floor-to-floor11
Floor plateper floor, from the city footprint8,326 sq ft
Daylight efficiencyshare within 35 ft of a facade100%
Deepest interior pointviability threshold is 80 ft30 ft
Windowless coreper floor — renovated but never rentable0 sq ft
Estimated homesat 750 sq ft average88
Conversion cost$405/sq ft all-in on 83,256 sq ft$33.7M
Gap before grantshortfall against completed value$1.5M
Modeled RESIDE grantbelow the statutory cap$5.3M
BuiltSan Francisco's own record of the construction year1905
ZoningFinancial District/South BeachC-3-R
Opportunity Zonenot in a 2018 designated tractNo

The plan: window line, shape and floor rhythm

54 ft of exterior wall for each home the screen estimates — enough for two- and three-bedroom homes across the plan.

The typical floor has 472 ft of exterior wall, and across 10 residential floors the building carries 4,723 ft of it in total, divided among the 88 homes this screen estimates.

Its plate is moderately compact at 0.47: a squarish plan, with enough perimeter for a conventional double-loaded corridor. How window line and plate shape are measured.

At the model’s 750 sq ft average, the plan works out at about 8.8 homes per floor, repeated on every residential floor, since this building's outline does not change as it rises.

Why 201 Grant Ave scores 94 out of 100

Daylight efficiency 100, Interior depth 100, Scale 59, Finance 100 — each out of 100, then weighted.

Score components for 201 Grant Ave. Points are the subscore times its weight.

ComponentSubscoreWeightPoints
Daylight efficiency100% of the floor area within 35 ft of a facade, scored from 40% up to 90%10045%45.0
Interior depthdeepest interior point 30 ft from a facade, scored from 80 ft down to 40 ft10025%25.0
Scale88 estimated homes, scored from 0 up to 1505915%8.8
Financecompleted value covers conversion cost with 11% to spare, which tops out the component10015%15.0

Most of what it earns comes from daylight efficiency, and what holds it back most is scale, at 59 out of 100: 88 estimated homes, scored from 0 up to 150.

Built in 1905

San Francisco records this building as going up in 1905, which puts it in the pre-1920 stock.

As a rule, the era that converts most readily: load-bearing masonry, small floor plates laid out before deep-plan offices were possible, operable windows and generous floor-to-floor heights. The usual obstacles are not daylight but hazardous materials, lifts and bringing structure up to current code. That is the era’s general tendency rather than a finding about this building — the model reads an outline and a height, and can see nothing inside — but it is the first thing an architect would want to know, and it colours how much confidence the 100% daylight figure above deserves.

What the conversion would cost

$405 per square foot all-in across 83,256 sq ft of converted floor, or $33.7M in total — about $383K for each of the 88 homes.

All-in cost per square foot for 201 Grant Ave: base cost plus the code work a change of use triggers.

Base conversion cost$260/sq ft
Seismic retrofit (change of use)$45/sq ft
Plumbing risers to every unit$40/sq ft
Operable windows and glazing$30/sq ft
Additional egress stair$18/sq ft
Fire sprinklers (NFPA 13R)$12/sq ft
All-in$405/sq ft

That cost is charged across every converted square foot, including the circulation and service area that earns nothing directly. Against it the model sets a completed value of $366K a home, which for 88 homes is $32.2M.

What would have to be true

A $1.5M gap before any grant, which the modeled $5.3M closes. What would reopen it soonest: circulation efficiency 10% down.

The shortfall before any grant is $1.5M. Closing it from the value side means each of the 88 homes finishing at $383K rather than the $366K the model assumes — 5% more. Closing it from the cost side means getting all-in cost down from $405 to $387 per square foot.

A modeled RESIDE grant of $5.3M moves that threshold to $323K a home. That is below the assumed value, which is why this building counts as unlocked by the grant — subject to it qualifying under the law's vacant-and-abandoned test, which this data cannot show.

Each of these, moved on its own, would be enough to undo that for 201 Grant Ave:

Single-assumption flip points for 201 Grant Ave, each holding the other three at their defaults.

Circulation efficiencythe binding constraint — the least this building would need10% downto 72%
Average unit size11% upto 833 sq ft
Completed value per home12% downto $323K
Conversion cost per square foot17% upto $305/sq ft

All four are sliders in the survey, where 201 Grant Ave re-scores against your own numbers.

How it compares in Downtown San Francisco

201 Grant Ave ranks 41st of the 205 buildings screened here, against a median score of 87.

Its floor plate is better lit than 100% of them, and shallower than 84% of them at its deepest interior point. On size it is the 130th largest by estimated homes. The full survey of all 205 buildings ranks and maps every one of them, and the list by address links each to its own page.

Within Financial District/South Beach and the C-3-R zone

38th of 165 in Financial District/South Beach, 4th of 25 zoned C-3-R — the comparison that shares its rules, rents and streets.

San Francisco places 165 of the screened buildings in Financial District/South Beach. 201 Grant Ave ranks 38th of them against a median score of 88. 121 score 70 or more, their median deepest interior point is 47 ft from a facade against this building’s 30 ft, and together they would hold an estimated 40,456 homes. The group’s top scorer is 870 Market St, at 100.

25 of the screened buildings are zoned C-3-R. 201 Grant Ave ranks 4th of them against a median score of 90. 21 score 70 or more, their median deepest interior point is 32 ft from a facade against this building’s 30 ft, and together they would hold an estimated 2,773 homes. The group’s top scorer is 870 Market St, at 100.

Its nearest match in size: 350 Post St

The screened building closest to 201 Grant Ave in converted floor area is 350 Post St: 89,536 sq ft over 11 stories, against 83,256 sq ft over 11 here.

The two land within a few points of each other — 94 here, 95 there — so at this size the screen reads them as much the same prospect. On the money they sit in the same place: each pencils only with the modeled RESIDE grant. The two stand about 600 ft apart.

Would it qualify for a RESIDE Act grant?

The model awards 201 Grant Ave $5.3M, on the assumption it qualifies. Whether it does, no published dataset can say.

That figure assumes the building meets the Act’s vacant-and-abandoned test, which turns on code-enforcement and receivership records no city publishes.

It does not sit in a 2018 designated Opportunity Zone, so it would not draw that Section 201 priority.

Other buildings screened near 201 Grant Ave

The 4 closest the screen also covers, from 260 ft away. They are the colored outlines on the plan at the top of this page.

  • 245 Post St
    6 stories · 100% daylit · 35 estimated homes · scores 89/100 (Strong candidate)
    about 260 ft away
  • 150 Post St
    7 stories · 86% daylit · 81 estimated homes · scores 82/100 (Strong candidate)
    about 260 ft away
  • 60 Maiden Ln
    10 stories · 100% daylit · 59 estimated homes · scores 91/100 (Strong candidate)
    about 260 ft away
  • 50 Maiden Ln
    5 stories · 100% daylit · 32 estimated homes · scores 88/100 (Strong candidate)
    about 310 ft away

A screen, not a feasibility study, from outlines and heights rather than plans: the method and how to correct a figure. If you know this building’s interior, you know what this model cannot see.