930 16th St

930 16th St is a 8-story building in Greater Downtown Denver with 78% of its floor area within daylight reach of a facade. This screen estimates 95 homes and scores it 61 out of 100 for office-to-residential conversion suitability.

CO-1 · Screened 2026-09-19 · Worth a feasibility study

Build a conversion planCheck its numbers, lay out its homes and get a two-page PDF. Free.

Also addressed as 934 16th St, 940 16th St and 950 16th St: Denver’s address records place all 4 on this one footprint.

Where 930 16th St is

Its block in Greater Downtown Denver, drawn from Denver's own building outlines and street centerlines.

Suitability score

0–29

30–49

50–69

70–100

Already housing
Not screened
930 16th St

930 16th St and the 1,000 ft of Greater Downtown Denver around it. The streets are drawn at the width of the right-of-way they run down, sidewalks included, and named, and every building on these blocks is drawn. What is left open and stippled is neither: a surface lot, a plaza or a vacant parcel. The screened buildings are colored by the ramp above, the same one the district map uses, carry their score, and each is a link to its own page. Each casts a shadow as long as its measured height lets it, so towers stand out from the low buildings around them; the unscreened buildings have no measured height and cast none. 930 16th St is outlined in its own score color at the outline it covers at ground level. Dashed inside it is the typical floor, the one the floor-plate figure below draws, because this building steps back as it rises. Its windowless core is hatched. The inset places it among every building the screen covers.

Typical floor plan: 78% of the building’s floor area sits within daylight reach of a facade; the drawing shows its typical floor, where the share is 76%. The shading is daylight, darkest at the windows and gone 35 ft in. The hatched area is windowless core: 4,613 sq ft per typical floor that must be renovated but can never be rented as an apartment. The dimension marks the deepest interior point, 63 ft from the nearest window. A–A is where the section beside it is cut.

Section A–A: cut across the depth of the plate, through the middle of the core. Daylight reaches 35 ft in from every facade, fading as it goes, and the hatched stripe left between the lit edges is floor that gets converted and can never be rented: 4,613 sq ft on the floor the screen scores, and 25,911 sq ft over 7 residential floors. The steps are where the building sets back as it rises. The shaded ground floor is converted like the rest and counted as no homes.

This building does not pencil at default assumptions, even with a modeled RESIDE Act grant.

Across its 7 residential floors this building carries 25,911 sq ft of windowless core — area that must be gutted, re-plumbed and sprinklered but can never be rented as an apartment.

Modeled conversion metrics for 930 16th St, 2026-09-19.

Suitability scoreWorth a feasibility study	61 / 100
Storiesfrom 100 ft aerial-survey height ÷ 12 ft floor-to-floor	8
Height bandsfloor plate by floor range, from the city's roof outlines	Floors 1–2: 21,179 sq ft · Floors 3–6: 19,449 sq ft · Floor 7: 15,417 sq ft · Floor 8: 1,325 sq ft
Floor platetypical floor, from the city outlines	19,449 sq ft
Daylight efficiencyshare within 35 ft of a facade	78%
Deepest interior pointviability threshold is 80 ft	63 ft
Windowless coretypical floor; the building-wide total is in the text above	4,613 sq ft
Estimated homesat 750 sq ft average	95
Conversion cost$360/sq ft all-in on 115,717 sq ft	$41.7M
Gap before grantshortfall against completed value	$19.2M
Modeled RESIDE grantbelow the statutory cap	$5.7M
BuiltDenver does not publish a construction year with this data	—
ZoningCBD	D-TD
Opportunity Zonenot in a 2018 designated tract	No

The plan: window line, shape and floor rhythm

39 ft of exterior wall for each home the screen estimates — enough for two- and three-bedroom homes across the plan.

The typical floor has 588 ft of exterior wall, and across 7 residential floors the building carries 3,722 ft of it in total, divided among the 95 homes this screen estimates.

Its plate is moderately compact at 0.71: a squarish plan, with enough perimeter for a conventional double-loaded corridor. How window line and plate shape are measured.

At the model’s 750 sq ft average, the plan works out at about 13.6 homes per floor, repeated on every residential floor, since this building's outline does not change as it rises.

Why 930 16th St scores 61 out of 100

Daylight efficiency 75, Interior depth 43, Scale 63, Finance 46 — each out of 100, then weighted.

Score components for 930 16th St. Points are the subscore times its weight.

Component	Subscore	Weight	Points
Daylight efficiency78% of the floor area within 35 ft of a facade, scored from 40% up to 90%	75	45%	33.8
Interior depthdeepest interior point 63 ft from a facade, scored from 80 ft down to 40 ft	43	25%	10.7
Scale95 estimated homes, scored from 0 up to 150	63	15%	9.5
Financeremaining gap is 32% of conversion cost, scored from 60% down to 0%	46	15%	6.9

Most of what it earns comes from daylight efficiency, and what holds it back most is interior depth, at 43 out of 100: deepest interior point 63 ft from a facade, scored from 80 ft down to 40 ft.

What the conversion would cost

$360 per square foot all-in across 115,717 sq ft of converted floor, or $41.7M in total — about $439K for each of the 95 homes.

All-in cost per square foot for 930 16th St: base cost plus the code work a change of use triggers.

Base conversion cost	$260/sq ft
Plumbing risers to every unit	$40/sq ft
Operable windows and glazing	$30/sq ft
Additional egress stair	$18/sq ft
Fire sprinklers (NFPA 13R)	$12/sq ft
All-in	$360/sq ft

That cost is charged across every converted square foot, including the 25,911 sq ft of windowless core, which has to be gutted, re-plumbed and sprinklered like the rest of the building and then earns nothing. Against it the model sets a completed value of $236K a home, which for 95 homes is $22.4M.

What would have to be true

A $19.2M gap before any grant, $13.5M after the modeled one. The smallest single change that would close it: average unit size 32% down.

The shortfall before any grant is $19.2M. Closing it from the value side means each of the 95 homes finishing at $439K rather than the $236K the model assumes — 86% more. Closing it from the cost side means getting all-in cost down from $360 to $194 per square foot.

A modeled RESIDE grant of $5.7M moves that threshold to $379K a home. That is still above the $236K assumed, leaving $13.5M uncovered, which is why the grant does not unlock this one.

Nor do all four levers have to move. For 930 16th St, one alone would close the gap at:

Single-assumption flip points for 930 16th St, each holding the other three at their defaults.

Average unit sizethe binding constraint — the least this building would need	32% downto 510 sq ft
Conversion cost per square foot	45% downto $143/sq ft
Completed value per home	60% upto $379K

All four are sliders in the survey, where 930 16th St re-scores against your own numbers.

How it compares in Greater Downtown Denver

930 16th St ranks 164th of the 214 buildings screened here, against a median score of 72.

Its floor plate is better lit than 34% of them, and shallower than 21% of them at its deepest interior point. On size it is the 162nd largest by estimated homes. The full survey of all 214 buildings ranks and maps every one of them, and the list by address links each to its own page.

Within CBD and the D-TD zone

59th of 75 in CBD, 14th of 20 zoned D-TD — the comparison that shares its rules, rents and streets.

Denver places 75 of the screened buildings in CBD. 930 16th St ranks 59th of them against a median score of 71. 40 score 70 or more, their median deepest interior point is 56 ft from a facade against this building’s 63 ft, and together they would hold an estimated 33,698 homes. The group’s top scorer is 918 17th St, at 97.

20 of the screened buildings are zoned D-TD. 930 16th St ranks 14th of them against a median score of 69. 10 score 70 or more, their median deepest interior point is 57 ft from a facade against this building’s 63 ft, and together they would hold an estimated 8,599 homes. The group’s top scorer is 918 17th St, at 97.

Its nearest match in size: 1475 Lawrence St

The screened building closest to 930 16th St in converted floor area is 1475 Lawrence St: 117,170 sq ft over 8 stories, against 115,717 sq ft over 8 here.

930 16th St scores 61 to its 87, and with the size held roughly equal most of that shortfall comes from daylight efficiency: 75 out of 100 here, 100 there (94% of the floor area within 35 ft of a facade, scored from 40% up to 90%). On the money they sit in the same place: each falls short even with the modeled grant. The two stand about 1,000 ft apart.

Would it qualify for a RESIDE Act grant?

The model awards 930 16th St $5.7M, on the assumption it qualifies. Whether it does, no published dataset can say.

That figure assumes the building meets the Act’s vacant-and-abandoned test, which turns on code-enforcement and receivership records no city publishes.

It does not sit in a 2018 designated Opportunity Zone, so it would not draw that Section 201 priority.

Other buildings screened near 930 16th St

The 4 closest the screen also covers, from 150 ft away. They are the colored outlines on the plan at the top of this page.

900 16th St
14 stories · 96% daylit · 170 estimated homes · scores 96/100 (Strong candidate)
about 150 ft away
951 16th St
9 stories · 71% daylit · 161 estimated homes · scores 61/100 (Worth a feasibility study)
about 230 ft away
1020 16th St
5 stories · 63% daylit · 77 estimated homes · scores 33/100 (Marginal)
about 270 ft away
820 16th St
10 stories · 79% daylit · 180 estimated homes · scores 67/100 (Worth a feasibility study)
about 370 ft away

A screen, not a feasibility study, from outlines and heights rather than plans: the method and how to correct a figure. If you know this building’s interior, you know what this model cannot see.