417-435 Washington St
417-435 Washington St is a 10-story building in Downtown Boston with 100% of its floor area within daylight reach of a facade. This screen estimates 152 homes and scores it 100 out of 100 for office-to-residential conversion suitability.
MA-7 & MA-8 · Screened 2026-10-04 · Strong candidate
Where 417-435 Washington St is
Its block in Downtown Boston, drawn from Boston's own building outlines and street centerlines.
- Already housing
- Not screened
- 417-435 Washington St
This building's conversion pencils at default assumptions without any subsidy.
This footprint has no windowless core at all: every point on the floor plate is within 35 ft of a facade, which is unusual and is the main reason it scores as well as it does.
Modeled conversion metrics for 417-435 Washington St, 2026-10-04.
| Suitability scoreStrong candidate | 100 / 100 |
|---|---|
| Storiesfrom 123 ft aerial-survey height ÷ 12 ft floor-to-floor | 10 |
| Floor plateper floor, from the city footprint | 15,905 sq ft |
| Daylight efficiencyshare within 35 ft of a facade | 100% |
| Deepest interior pointviability threshold is 80 ft | 35 ft |
| Windowless corea measured sliver under 10 sq ft, not counted as windowless floor | 1 sq ft |
| Estimated homesat 750 sq ft average | 152 |
| Conversion cost$360/sq ft all-in on 143,146 sq ft | $51.5M |
| Gap before grantpencils unsubsidized | -$15.6M |
| Modeled RESIDE grantbelow the statutory cap | $9.1M |
| BuiltBoston's own record of the construction year | 1925 |
| ZoningDowntown Boston | SKY-LOW-DT |
| Opportunity Zonenot in a 2018 designated tract | No |
The plan: window line, shape and floor rhythm
39 ft of exterior wall for each home the screen estimates — enough for two- and three-bedroom homes across the plan.
The typical floor has 665 ft of exterior wall, and across 9 residential floors the building carries 5,988 ft of it in total, divided among the 152 homes this screen estimates.
Its plate is moderately compact at 0.45: a squarish plan, with enough perimeter for a conventional double-loaded corridor. How window line and plate shape are measured.
At the model’s 750 sq ft average, the plan works out at about 16.9 homes per floor, repeated on every residential floor, since this building's outline does not change as it rises.
Why 417-435 Washington St scores 100 out of 100
Daylight efficiency 100, Interior depth 100, Scale 100, Finance 100 — each out of 100, then weighted.
Score components for 417-435 Washington St. Points are the subscore times its weight.
| Component | Subscore | Weight | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daylight efficiency100% of the floor area within 35 ft of a facade, scored from 40% up to 90% | 100 | 45% | 45.0 |
| Interior depthdeepest interior point 35 ft from a facade, scored from 80 ft down to 40 ft | 100 | 25% | 25.0 |
| Scale152 estimated homes, scored from 0 up to 150 | 100 | 15% | 15.0 |
| Financecompleted value covers conversion cost with 48% to spare, which tops out the component | 100 | 15% | 15.0 |
Every component scores at or near full marks, so nothing in the geometry or the pro-forma is holding this one back — daylight efficiency carries the most weight of the four.
Built in 1925
Boston records this building as going up in 1925, which puts it in the interwar stock.
As a rule, steel or concrete frames with punched windows and plates still narrow enough for daylight to reach the middle, often with high ceilings. Among the most convertible stock there is, and the reason so many early conversions were of buildings this age. That is the era’s general tendency rather than a finding about this building — the model reads an outline and a height, and can see nothing inside — but it is the first thing an architect would want to know, and it colours how much confidence the 100% daylight figure above deserves.
What the conversion would cost
$360 per square foot all-in across 143,146 sq ft of converted floor, or $51.5M in total — about $339K for each of the 152 homes.
All-in cost per square foot for 417-435 Washington St: base cost plus the code work a change of use triggers.
| Base conversion cost | $260/sq ft |
|---|---|
| Plumbing risers to every unit | $40/sq ft |
| Operable windows and glazing | $30/sq ft |
| Additional egress stair | $18/sq ft |
| Fire sprinklers (NFPA 13R) | $12/sq ft |
| All-in | $360/sq ft |
That cost is charged across every converted square foot, including the circulation and service area that earns nothing directly. Against it the model sets a completed value of $442K a home, which for 152 homes is $67.1M.
What would have to be true
This one already clears the bar. The question is how much room it has before it stops.
At $442K a home, completed value covers the $51.5M of work with $15.6M to spare. Value per home would have to fall to $339K — 23% below the assumption — before the conversion stopped penciling, or all-in cost would have to rise from $360 to $469 per square foot. Neither is a wide margin in a market that moves, but this building does not need a grant to work.
Each of these, moved on its own, would be enough to undo that for 417-435 Washington St:
Single-assumption flip points for 417-435 Washington St, each holding the other three at their defaults.
| Circulation efficiencythe binding constraint — the least this building would need | 33% downto 54% |
|---|---|
| Completed value per home | 37% downto $279K |
| Average unit size | 48% upto 1,112 sq ft |
| Conversion cost per square foot | 66% upto $433/sq ft |
All four are sliders in the survey, where 417-435 Washington St re-scores against your own numbers.
How it compares in Downtown Boston
417-435 Washington St ranks 1st of the 96 buildings screened here, against a median score of 89.
Its floor plate is better lit than 81% of them, and shallower than 79% of them at its deepest interior point. On size it is the 53rd largest by estimated homes. The full survey of all 96 buildings ranks and maps every one of them, and the list by address links each to its own page.
Within the SKY-LOW-DT zone
1st of 25 zoned SKY-LOW-DT — the comparison that shares its rules, rents and streets.
25 of the screened buildings are zoned SKY-LOW-DT. 417-435 Washington St ranks 1st of them against a median score of 91, the top score in the group. 24 score 70 or more, their median deepest interior point is 35 ft from a facade against this building’s 35 ft, and together they would hold an estimated 2,629 homes. The group’s top scorer is 36-44 Broad St, at 100.
Its nearest match in size: 10-30 School St
The screened building closest to 417-435 Washington St in converted floor area is 10-30 School St: 131,377 sq ft over 9 stories, against 143,146 sq ft over 10 here.
417-435 Washington St scores 100 to its 81, and with the size held roughly equal most of that lead comes from interior depth: 100 out of 100 here, 53 there (deepest interior point 59 ft from a facade, scored from 80 ft down to 40 ft). On the money they sit in the same place: each pencils without a subsidy. The two stand about 700 ft apart.
Would it qualify for a RESIDE Act grant?
The model awards 417-435 Washington St $9.1M, on the assumption it qualifies. Whether it does, no published dataset can say.
That figure assumes the building meets the Act’s vacant-and-abandoned test, which turns on code-enforcement and receivership records no city publishes.
It does not sit in a 2018 designated Opportunity Zone, so it would not draw that Section 201 priority.
Other buildings screened near 417-435 Washington St
The 4 closest the screen also covers, from 180 ft away. They are the colored outlines on the plan at the top of this page.
- 17-33 Winter St7 stories · 83% daylit · 82 estimated homes · scores 78/100 (Strong candidate)about 180 ft away
- 28-38 Winter St14 stories · 95% daylit · 106 estimated homes · scores 95/100 (Strong candidate)about 260 ft away
- 32-38 Bromfield St6 stories · 100% daylit · 44 estimated homes · scores 89/100 (Strong candidate)about 290 ft away
- 60-70 Temple Pl7 stories · 95% daylit · 50 estimated homes · scores 89/100 (Strong candidate)about 320 ft away
A screen, not a feasibility study, from outlines and heights rather than plans: the method and how to correct a figure. If you know this building’s interior, you know what this model cannot see.