60-70 Temple Pl

60-70 Temple Pl is a 7-story building in Downtown Boston with 95% of its floor area within daylight reach of a facade. This screen estimates 50 homes and scores it 89 out of 100 for office-to-residential conversion suitability.

MA-7 & MA-8 · Screened 2026-10-04 · Strong candidate

Build a free conversion planCheck its numbers, lay out its homes and get a two-page PDF. Free.

Where 60-70 Temple Pl is

Its block in Downtown Boston, drawn from Boston's own building outlines and street centerlines.

417-435 Washington St: scores 100 out of 100150 Tremont St: already housing28-38 Winter St: scores 95 out of 10025-31 West St: scores 88 out of 10093-101 Arch St: scores 72 out of 1001 Avenue De Lafayette: scores 35 out of 10021-53 Summer St: scores 27 out of 100100958872352789Temple PLWashington STWest STMason STWinter STHawley STN100 ftDowntown Boston
Suitability score
0–29
30–49
50–69
70–100
  • Already housing
  • Not screened
  • 60-70 Temple Pl
60-70 Temple Pl and the 1,000 ft of Downtown Boston around it. The streets are drawn at the width of the right-of-way they run down, sidewalks included, and named, and every building on these blocks is drawn. What is left open and stippled is neither: a surface lot, a plaza or a vacant parcel. The screened buildings are colored by the ramp above, the same one the district map uses, carry their score, and each is a link to its own page. Each casts a shadow as long as its measured height lets it, so towers stand out from the low buildings around them; the unscreened buildings have no measured height and cast none. 60-70 Temple Pl is outlined in its own score color at the outline it covers at ground level. Its windowless core is hatched. The inset places it among every building the screen covers.
42 ftAA50 ftDaylit 95%Core 412 sq ft
Floor plan: 95% of each floor sits within daylight reach of a facade. The shading is daylight, darkest at the windows and gone 35 ft in. The hatched area is windowless core: 412 sq ft per floor that must be renovated but can never be rented as an apartment. The dimension marks the deepest interior point, 42 ft from the nearest window. A–A is where the section beside it is cut.
No homesWindowless core7 floors25 ft
Section A–A: cut across the depth of the plate, through the middle of the core. Daylight reaches 35 ft in from every facade, fading as it goes, and the hatched stripe left between the lit edges is floor that gets converted and can never be rented: 412 sq ft on the floor the screen scores, and 2,473 sq ft over 6 residential floors. The shaded ground floor is converted like the rest and counted as no homes.

This building's conversion pencils at default assumptions without any subsidy.

Every floor carries 412 sq ft of windowless core — area that must be gutted, re-plumbed and sprinklered but can never be rented as an apartment. Across 6 residential floors that is 2,473 sq ft of cost carrying no revenue.

Modeled conversion metrics for 60-70 Temple Pl, 2026-10-04.

Suitability scoreStrong candidate89 / 100
Storiesfrom 83 ft aerial-survey height ÷ 12 ft floor-to-floor7
Floor plateper floor, from the city footprint8,334 sq ft
Daylight efficiencyshare within 35 ft of a facade95%
Deepest interior pointviability threshold is 80 ft42 ft
Windowless coreper floor — renovated but never rentable412 sq ft
Estimated homesat 750 sq ft average50
Conversion cost$360/sq ft all-in on 50,005 sq ft$18.0M
Gap before grantpencils unsubsidized-$4.1M
Modeled RESIDE grantbelow the statutory cap$3.0M
BuiltBoston's own record of the construction year1920
ZoningDowntown BostonSKY-LOW-DT
Opportunity Zonenot in a 2018 designated tractNo

The plan: window line, shape and floor rhythm

44 ft of exterior wall for each home the screen estimates — enough for two- and three-bedroom homes across the plan.

The typical floor has 366 ft of exterior wall, and across 6 residential floors the building carries 2,193 ft of it in total, divided among the 50 homes this screen estimates.

Its plate is compact at 0.78: close to a square or a circle, the most efficient envelope an office can have and the least generous one for apartments: little perimeter to divide among homes. How window line and plate shape are measured.

At the model’s 750 sq ft average, the plan works out at about 8.3 homes per floor, repeated on every residential floor, since this building's outline does not change as it rises.

Why 60-70 Temple Pl scores 89 out of 100

Daylight efficiency 100, Interior depth 95, Scale 33, Finance 100 — each out of 100, then weighted.

Score components for 60-70 Temple Pl. Points are the subscore times its weight.

ComponentSubscoreWeightPoints
Daylight efficiency95% of the floor area within 35 ft of a facade, scored from 40% up to 90%10045%45.0
Interior depthdeepest interior point 42 ft from a facade, scored from 80 ft down to 40 ft9525%23.7
Scale50 estimated homes, scored from 0 up to 1503315%5.0
Financecompleted value covers conversion cost with 39% to spare, which tops out the component10015%15.0

Most of what it earns comes from daylight efficiency, and what holds it back most is scale, at 33 out of 100: 50 estimated homes, scored from 0 up to 150.

Built in 1920

Boston records this building as going up in 1920, which puts it in the interwar stock.

As a rule, steel or concrete frames with punched windows and plates still narrow enough for daylight to reach the middle, often with high ceilings. Among the most convertible stock there is, and the reason so many early conversions were of buildings this age. That is the era’s general tendency rather than a finding about this building — the model reads an outline and a height, and can see nothing inside — but it is the first thing an architect would want to know, and it colours how much confidence the 95% daylight figure above deserves.

What the conversion would cost

$360 per square foot all-in across 50,005 sq ft of converted floor, or $18.0M in total — about $360K for each of the 50 homes.

All-in cost per square foot for 60-70 Temple Pl: base cost plus the code work a change of use triggers.

Base conversion cost$260/sq ft
Plumbing risers to every unit$40/sq ft
Operable windows and glazing$30/sq ft
Additional egress stair$18/sq ft
Fire sprinklers (NFPA 13R)$12/sq ft
All-in$360/sq ft

That cost is charged across every converted square foot, including the 2,473 sq ft of windowless core, which has to be gutted, re-plumbed and sprinklered like the rest of the building and then earns nothing. Against it the model sets a completed value of $442K a home, which for 50 homes is $22.1M.

What would have to be true

This one already clears the bar. The question is how much room it has before it stops.

At $442K a home, completed value covers the $18.0M of work with $4.1M to spare. Value per home would have to fall to $360K — 18% below the assumption — before the conversion stopped penciling, or all-in cost would have to rise from $360 to $441 per square foot. Neither is a wide margin in a market that moves, but this building does not need a grant to work.

Each of these, moved on its own, would be enough to undo that for 60-70 Temple Pl:

Single-assumption flip points for 60-70 Temple Pl, each holding the other three at their defaults.

Circulation efficiencythe binding constraint — the least this building would need29% downto 57%
Completed value per home32% downto $300K
Average unit size41% upto 1,056 sq ft
Conversion cost per square foot54% upto $401/sq ft

All four are sliders in the survey, where 60-70 Temple Pl re-scores against your own numbers.

How it compares in Downtown Boston

60-70 Temple Pl ranks 47th of the 96 buildings screened here, against a median score of 89.

Its floor plate is better lit than 63% of them, and shallower than 65% of them at its deepest interior point. On size it is the 86th largest by estimated homes. The full survey of all 96 buildings ranks and maps every one of them, and the list by address links each to its own page.

Within the SKY-LOW-DT zone

20th of 25 zoned SKY-LOW-DT — the comparison that shares its rules, rents and streets.

25 of the screened buildings are zoned SKY-LOW-DT. 60-70 Temple Pl ranks 20th of them against a median score of 91. 24 score 70 or more, their median deepest interior point is 35 ft from a facade against this building’s 42 ft, and together they would hold an estimated 2,629 homes. The group’s top scorer is 36-44 Broad St, at 100.

Its nearest match in size: 40-62 Franklin St

The screened building closest to 60-70 Temple Pl in converted floor area is 40-62 Franklin St: 51,840 sq ft over 5 stories, against 50,005 sq ft over 7 here.

60-70 Temple Pl scores 89 to its 76, and with the size held roughly equal most of that lead comes from interior depth: 95 out of 100 here, 61 there (deepest interior point 55 ft from a facade, scored from 80 ft down to 40 ft). On the money they sit in the same place: each pencils without a subsidy. The two stand about 800 ft apart.

Would it qualify for a RESIDE Act grant?

The model awards 60-70 Temple Pl $3.0M, on the assumption it qualifies. Whether it does, no published dataset can say.

That figure assumes the building meets the Act’s vacant-and-abandoned test, which turns on code-enforcement and receivership records no city publishes.

It does not sit in a 2018 designated Opportunity Zone, so it would not draw that Section 201 priority.

Other buildings screened near 60-70 Temple Pl

The 4 closest the screen also covers, from 250 ft away. They are the colored outlines on the plan at the top of this page.

  • 28-38 Winter St
    14 stories · 95% daylit · 106 estimated homes · scores 95/100 (Strong candidate)
    about 250 ft away
  • 25-31 West St
    5 stories · 100% daylit · 31 estimated homes · scores 88/100 (Strong candidate)
    about 310 ft away
  • 21-53 Summer St
    11 stories · 47% daylit · 401 estimated homes · scores 27/100 (Unlikely)
    about 320 ft away
  • 417-435 Washington St
    10 stories · 100% daylit · 152 estimated homes · scores 100/100 (Strong candidate)
    about 320 ft away

A screen, not a feasibility study, from outlines and heights rather than plans: the method and how to correct a figure. If you know this building’s interior, you know what this model cannot see.