479 Jessie St

479 Jessie St is a 4-story building in Downtown San Francisco with 100% of its floor area within daylight reach of a facade. This screen estimates 26 homes and scores it 88 out of 100 for office-to-residential conversion suitability.

CA-11 · Screened 2026-10-12 · Strong candidate

Build a free conversion planCheck its numbers, lay out its homes and get a two-page PDF. Free.

Also addressed as 982 Mission St and 984 Mission St: San Francisco’s address records place all 3 on this one footprint.

Where 479 Jessie St is

Its block in Downtown San Francisco, drawn from San Francisco's own building outlines and street centerlines.

959 Mission St: scores 92 out of 1001017 Market St: scores 91 out of 100979 Market St: scores 75 out of 100927588MISSION STJESSIE STMINNA STSTEVENSON ST6TH STN100 ftDowntown San Francisco
Suitability score
0–29
30–49
50–69
70–100
  • Already housing
  • Not screened
  • 479 Jessie St
479 Jessie St and the 1,000 ft of Downtown San Francisco around it. The streets are drawn at the width of the right-of-way they run down, sidewalks included, and named, and every building on these blocks is drawn. What is left open and stippled is neither: a surface lot, a plaza or a vacant parcel. The screened buildings are colored by the ramp above, the same one the district map uses, carry their score, and each is a link to its own page. Each casts a shadow as long as its measured height lets it, so towers stand out from the low buildings around them; the unscreened buildings have no measured height and cast none. 479 Jessie St is outlined in its own score color at the outline it covers at ground level. The inset places it among every building the screen covers.
26 ftAA50 ftDaylit 100%
Floor plan: 100% of each floor sits within daylight reach of a facade, with no dead core at all. The shading is daylight, darkest at the windows and gone 35 ft in. The dimension marks the deepest interior point, 26 ft from the nearest window. A–A is where the section beside it is cut.
Ground floor · no homesDaylit4 floors25 ft
Section A–A: cut across the depth of the plate, through the middle of the core. Daylight reaches 35 ft in from every facade, and here it meets in the middle: the plate is thin enough that no floor is left windowless. The shaded ground floor is converted like the rest and counted as no homes.

This building does not pencil on its own, but a modeled RESIDE Act grant would close the gap if the building qualified for one.

This footprint has no windowless core at all: every point on the floor plate is within 35 ft of a facade, which is unusual and is the main reason it scores as well as it does.

Modeled conversion metrics for 479 Jessie St, 2026-10-12.

Suitability scoreStrong candidate88 / 100
Storiesfrom 60 ft LiDAR (2010) height ÷ 12 ft floor-to-floor4
Floor plateper floor, from the city footprint8,371 sq ft
Daylight efficiencyshare within 35 ft of a facade100%
Deepest interior pointviability threshold is 80 ft26 ft
Windowless coreper floor — renovated but never rentable0 sq ft
Estimated homesat 750 sq ft average26
Conversion cost$405/sq ft all-in on 25,113 sq ft$10.2M
Gap before grantshortfall against completed value$655K
Modeled RESIDE grantbelow the statutory cap$1.6M
BuiltSan Francisco's own record of the construction year1924
ZoningSouth of MarketC-3-G
Opportunity Zonenot in a 2018 designated tractNo

The plan: window line, shape and floor rhythm

49 ft of exterior wall for each home the screen estimates — enough for two- and three-bedroom homes across the plan.

The typical floor has 428 ft of exterior wall, and across 3 residential floors the building carries 1,283 ft of it in total, divided among the 26 homes this screen estimates.

Its plate is moderately compact at 0.57: a squarish plan, with enough perimeter for a conventional double-loaded corridor. How window line and plate shape are measured.

At the model’s 750 sq ft average, the plan works out at about 8.7 homes per floor, repeated on every residential floor, since this building's outline does not change as it rises.

Why 479 Jessie St scores 88 out of 100

Daylight efficiency 100, Interior depth 100, Scale 17, Finance 100 — each out of 100, then weighted.

Score components for 479 Jessie St. Points are the subscore times its weight.

ComponentSubscoreWeightPoints
Daylight efficiency100% of the floor area within 35 ft of a facade, scored from 40% up to 90%10045%45.0
Interior depthdeepest interior point 26 ft from a facade, scored from 80 ft down to 40 ft10025%25.0
Scale26 estimated homes, scored from 0 up to 1501715%2.6
Financecompleted value covers conversion cost with 9% to spare, which tops out the component10015%15.0

Most of what it earns comes from daylight efficiency, and what holds it back most is scale, at 17 out of 100: 26 estimated homes, scored from 0 up to 150.

Built in 1924

San Francisco records this building as going up in 1924, which puts it in the interwar stock.

As a rule, steel or concrete frames with punched windows and plates still narrow enough for daylight to reach the middle, often with high ceilings. Among the most convertible stock there is, and the reason so many early conversions were of buildings this age. That is the era’s general tendency rather than a finding about this building — the model reads an outline and a height, and can see nothing inside — but it is the first thing an architect would want to know, and it colours how much confidence the 100% daylight figure above deserves.

What the conversion would cost

$405 per square foot all-in across 25,113 sq ft of converted floor, or $10.2M in total — about $391K for each of the 26 homes.

All-in cost per square foot for 479 Jessie St: base cost plus the code work a change of use triggers.

Base conversion cost$260/sq ft
Seismic retrofit (change of use)$45/sq ft
Plumbing risers to every unit$40/sq ft
Operable windows and glazing$30/sq ft
Additional egress stair$18/sq ft
Fire sprinklers (NFPA 13R)$12/sq ft
All-in$405/sq ft

That cost is charged across every converted square foot, including the circulation and service area that earns nothing directly. Against it the model sets a completed value of $366K a home, which for 26 homes is $9.5M.

What would have to be true

A $655K gap before any grant, which the modeled $1.6M closes. What would reopen it soonest: completed value per home 10% down.

The shortfall before any grant is $655K. Closing it from the value side means each of the 26 homes finishing at $391K rather than the $366K the model assumes — 7% more. Closing it from the cost side means getting all-in cost down from $405 to $379 per square foot.

A modeled RESIDE grant of $1.6M moves that threshold to $331K a home. That is below the assumed value, which is why this building counts as unlocked by the grant — subject to it qualifying under the law's vacant-and-abandoned test, which this data cannot show.

Each of these, moved on its own, would be enough to undo that for 479 Jessie St:

Single-assumption flip points for 479 Jessie St, each holding the other three at their defaults.

Completed value per homethe binding constraint — the least this building would need10% downto $331K
Circulation efficiency10% downto 72%
Average unit size12% upto 837 sq ft
Conversion cost per square foot14% upto $296/sq ft

All four are sliders in the survey, where 479 Jessie St re-scores against your own numbers.

How it compares in Downtown San Francisco

479 Jessie St ranks 99th of the 205 buildings screened here, against a median score of 87.

Its floor plate is better lit than 100% of them, and shallower than 93% of them at its deepest interior point. On size it is the 201st largest by estimated homes. The full survey of all 205 buildings ranks and maps every one of them, and the list by address links each to its own page.

Within South of Market and the C-3-G zone

7th of 14 in South of Market, 8th of 22 zoned C-3-G — the comparison that shares its rules, rents and streets.

San Francisco places 14 of the screened buildings in South of Market. 479 Jessie St ranks 7th of them against a median score of 82. 9 score 70 or more, their median deepest interior point is 45 ft from a facade against this building’s 26 ft, and together they would hold an estimated 2,045 homes. The group’s top scorer is 431 Natoma St, at 100.

22 of the screened buildings are zoned C-3-G. 479 Jessie St ranks 8th of them against a median score of 76. 13 score 70 or more, their median deepest interior point is 51 ft from a facade against this building’s 26 ft, and together they would hold an estimated 2,588 homes. The group’s top scorer is 40 Leavenworth St, at 92.

Its nearest match in size: 647 Mission St

The screened building closest to 479 Jessie St in converted floor area is 647 Mission St: 24,953 sq ft over 5 stories, against 25,113 sq ft over 4 here.

The two land within a few points of each other — 88 here, 88 there — so at this size the screen reads them as much the same prospect. On the money they sit in the same place: each pencils only with the modeled RESIDE grant. The two stand about 3,000 ft apart.

Would it qualify for a RESIDE Act grant?

The model awards 479 Jessie St $1.6M, on the assumption it qualifies. Whether it does, no published dataset can say.

That figure assumes the building meets the Act’s vacant-and-abandoned test, which turns on code-enforcement and receivership records no city publishes.

It does not sit in a 2018 designated Opportunity Zone, so it would not draw that Section 201 priority.

Other buildings screened near 479 Jessie St

The 4 closest the screen also covers, from 290 ft away. They are the colored outlines on the plan at the top of this page.

  • 959 Mission St
    7 stories · 100% daylit · 70 estimated homes · scores 92/100 (Strong candidate)
    about 290 ft away
  • 979 Market St
    6 stories · 82% daylit · 75 estimated homes · scores 75/100 (Strong candidate)
    about 380 ft away
  • 1017 Market St
    6 stories · 99% daylit · 58 estimated homes · scores 91/100 (Strong candidate)
    about 540 ft away
  • 901 Market St
    5 stories · 64% daylit · 83 estimated homes · scores 35/100 (Marginal)
    about 710 ft away

A screen, not a feasibility study, from outlines and heights rather than plans: the method and how to correct a figure. If you know this building’s interior, you know what this model cannot see.