40 Leavenworth St

40 Leavenworth St is a 6-story building in Downtown San Francisco with 100% of its floor area within daylight reach of a facade. This screen estimates 68 homes and scores it 92 out of 100 for office-to-residential conversion suitability.

CA-11 · Screened 2026-10-12 · Strong candidate

Build a free conversion planCheck its numbers, lay out its homes and get a two-page PDF. Free.

Also addressed as 1128 Market St and 10 United Nations Plz: San Francisco’s address records place all 3 on this one footprint.

Where 40 Leavenworth St is

Its block in Downtown San Francisco, drawn from San Francisco's own building outlines and street centerlines.

1059 Market St: scores 90 out of 1001067 Market St: scores 89 out of 1001170 Market St: scores 89 out of 1002 Hyde St: scores 50 out of 10092MCALLISTER STMARKET STCHARLES J BRENHAM PL7TH STSTEVENSON STN100 ftDowntown San Francisco
Suitability score
0–29
30–49
50–69
70–100
  • Already housing
  • Not screened
  • 40 Leavenworth St
40 Leavenworth St and the 1,000 ft of Downtown San Francisco around it. The streets are drawn at the width of the right-of-way they run down, sidewalks included, and named, and every building on these blocks is drawn. What is left open and stippled is neither: a surface lot, a plaza or a vacant parcel. The screened buildings are colored by the ramp above, the same one the district map uses, carry their score, and each is a link to its own page. Each casts a shadow as long as its measured height lets it, so towers stand out from the low buildings around them; the unscreened buildings have no measured height and cast none. 40 Leavenworth St is outlined in its own score color at the outline it covers at ground level. The inset places it among every building the screen covers.
34 ftAA50 ftDaylit 100%
Floor plan: 100% of each floor sits within daylight reach of a facade, with no dead core at all. The shading is daylight, darkest at the windows and gone 35 ft in. The dimension marks the deepest interior point, 34 ft from the nearest window. A–A is where the section beside it is cut.
Ground floor · no homesDaylit6 floors50 ft
Section A–A: cut across the depth of the plate, through the middle of the core. Daylight reaches 35 ft in from every facade, and here it meets in the middle: the plate is thin enough that no floor is left windowless. The shaded ground floor is converted like the rest and counted as no homes.

This building does not pencil on its own, but a modeled RESIDE Act grant would close the gap if the building qualified for one.

This footprint has no windowless core at all: every point on the floor plate is within 35 ft of a facade, which is unusual and is the main reason it scores as well as it does.

Modeled conversion metrics for 40 Leavenworth St, 2026-10-12.

Suitability scoreStrong candidate92 / 100
Storiesfrom 81 ft LiDAR (2010) height ÷ 12 ft floor-to-floor6
Floor plateper floor, from the city footprint12,785 sq ft
Daylight efficiencyshare within 35 ft of a facade100%
Deepest interior pointviability threshold is 80 ft34 ft
Windowless coreper floor — renovated but never rentable0 sq ft
Estimated homesat 750 sq ft average68
Conversion cost$405/sq ft all-in on 63,924 sq ft$25.9M
Gap before grantshortfall against completed value$1.0M
Modeled RESIDE grantbelow the statutory cap$4.1M
BuiltSan Francisco's own record of the construction year1982
ZoningTenderloinC-3-G
Opportunity Zonenot in a 2018 designated tractNo

The plan: window line, shape and floor rhythm

44 ft of exterior wall for each home the screen estimates — enough for two- and three-bedroom homes across the plan.

The typical floor has 596 ft of exterior wall, and across 5 residential floors the building carries 2,981 ft of it in total, divided among the 68 homes this screen estimates.

Its plate is moderately compact at 0.45: a squarish plan, with enough perimeter for a conventional double-loaded corridor. How window line and plate shape are measured.

At the model’s 750 sq ft average, the plan works out at about 13.6 homes per floor, repeated on every residential floor, since this building's outline does not change as it rises.

Why 40 Leavenworth St scores 92 out of 100

Daylight efficiency 100, Interior depth 100, Scale 45, Finance 100 — each out of 100, then weighted.

Score components for 40 Leavenworth St. Points are the subscore times its weight.

ComponentSubscoreWeightPoints
Daylight efficiency100% of the floor area within 35 ft of a facade, scored from 40% up to 90%10045%45.0
Interior depthdeepest interior point 34 ft from a facade, scored from 80 ft down to 40 ft10025%25.0
Scale68 estimated homes, scored from 0 up to 1504515%6.8
Financecompleted value covers conversion cost with 12% to spare, which tops out the component10015%15.0

Most of what it earns comes from daylight efficiency, and what holds it back most is scale, at 45 out of 100: 68 estimated homes, scored from 0 up to 150.

Built in 1982

San Francisco records this building as going up in 1982, which puts it in the late-modern stock.

As a rule, typically the hardest to convert: the deepest plates of any era, large central cores, and floor-to-floor heights tight enough that running residential drainage under a ceiling can be the thing that ends a project. That is the era’s general tendency rather than a finding about this building — the model reads an outline and a height, and can see nothing inside — but it is the first thing an architect would want to know, and it colours how much confidence the 100% daylight figure above deserves.

What the conversion would cost

$405 per square foot all-in across 63,924 sq ft of converted floor, or $25.9M in total — about $381K for each of the 68 homes.

All-in cost per square foot for 40 Leavenworth St: base cost plus the code work a change of use triggers.

Base conversion cost$260/sq ft
Seismic retrofit (change of use)$45/sq ft
Plumbing risers to every unit$40/sq ft
Operable windows and glazing$30/sq ft
Additional egress stair$18/sq ft
Fire sprinklers (NFPA 13R)$12/sq ft
All-in$405/sq ft

That cost is charged across every converted square foot, including the circulation and service area that earns nothing directly. Against it the model sets a completed value of $366K a home, which for 68 homes is $24.9M.

What would have to be true

A $1.0M gap before any grant, which the modeled $4.1M closes. What would reopen it soonest: circulation efficiency 11% down.

The shortfall before any grant is $1.0M. Closing it from the value side means each of the 68 homes finishing at $381K rather than the $366K the model assumes — 4% more. Closing it from the cost side means getting all-in cost down from $405 to $389 per square foot.

A modeled RESIDE grant of $4.1M moves that threshold to $321K a home. That is below the assumed value, which is why this building counts as unlocked by the grant — subject to it qualifying under the law's vacant-and-abandoned test, which this data cannot show.

Each of these, moved on its own, would be enough to undo that for 40 Leavenworth St:

Single-assumption flip points for 40 Leavenworth St, each holding the other three at their defaults.

Circulation efficiencythe binding constraint — the least this building would need11% downto 72%
Average unit size12% upto 838 sq ft
Completed value per home12% downto $321K
Conversion cost per square foot19% upto $308/sq ft

All four are sliders in the survey, where 40 Leavenworth St re-scores against your own numbers.

How it compares in Downtown San Francisco

40 Leavenworth St ranks 52nd of the 205 buildings screened here, against a median score of 87.

Its floor plate is better lit than 100% of them, and shallower than 74% of them at its deepest interior point. On size it is the 151st largest by estimated homes. The full survey of all 205 buildings ranks and maps every one of them, and the list by address links each to its own page.

Within Tenderloin and the C-3-G zone

1st of 7 in Tenderloin, 1st of 22 zoned C-3-G — the comparison that shares its rules, rents and streets.

San Francisco places 7 of the screened buildings in Tenderloin. 40 Leavenworth St ranks 1st of them against a median score of 89, the top score in the group. 4 score 70 or more, their median deepest interior point is 34 ft from a facade against this building’s 34 ft, and together they would hold an estimated 499 homes.

22 of the screened buildings are zoned C-3-G. 40 Leavenworth St ranks 1st of them against a median score of 76, the top score in the group. 13 score 70 or more, their median deepest interior point is 51 ft from a facade against this building’s 34 ft, and together they would hold an estimated 2,588 homes.

Its nearest match in size: 137 New Montgomery St

The screened building closest to 40 Leavenworth St in converted floor area is 137 New Montgomery St: 64,287 sq ft over 6 stories, against 63,924 sq ft over 6 here.

The two land within a few points of each other — 92 here, 91 there — so at this size the screen reads them as much the same prospect. On the money they sit in the same place: each pencils only with the modeled RESIDE grant. The two stand about 4,600 ft apart.

Would it qualify for a RESIDE Act grant?

The model awards 40 Leavenworth St $4.1M, on the assumption it qualifies. Whether it does, no published dataset can say.

That figure assumes the building meets the Act’s vacant-and-abandoned test, which turns on code-enforcement and receivership records no city publishes.

It does not sit in a 2018 designated Opportunity Zone, so it would not draw that Section 201 priority.

Other buildings screened near 40 Leavenworth St

The 4 closest the screen also covers, from 480 ft away. They are the colored outlines on the plan at the top of this page.

  • 1170 Market St
    7 stories · 100% daylit · 40 estimated homes · scores 89/100 (Strong candidate)
    about 480 ft away
  • 1067 Market St
    6 stories · 100% daylit · 42 estimated homes · scores 89/100 (Strong candidate)
    about 510 ft away
  • 1059 Market St
    6 stories · 100% daylit · 47 estimated homes · scores 90/100 (Strong candidate)
    about 570 ft away
  • 2 Hyde St
    4 stories · 72% daylit · 71 estimated homes · scores 50/100 (Marginal)
    about 600 ft away

A screen, not a feasibility study, from outlines and heights rather than plans: the method and how to correct a figure. If you know this building’s interior, you know what this model cannot see.