1665 N Grant St

1665 N Grant St is a 5-story building in Greater Downtown Denver with 100% of its floor area within daylight reach of a facade. This screen estimates 29 homes and scores it 85 out of 100 for office-to-residential conversion suitability.

CO-1 · Screened 2026-09-19 · Strong candidate

Build a conversion planCheck its numbers, lay out its homes and get a two-page PDF. Free.

Where 1665 N Grant St is

Its block in Greater Downtown Denver, drawn from Denver's own building outlines and street centerlines.

300 E 17th Ave: scores 96 out of 1001651 N Logan St: scores 95 out of 100225 E 16th Ave: scores 88 out of 1001673 N Sherman St: scores 84 out of 1001660 N Sherman St: scores 72 out of 1001660 N Lincoln St: scores 71 out of 100303 E 17th Ave: scores 56 out of 1001700 N Broadway: scores 56 out of 1009695847271565685E 17TH AVEN SHERMAN STN LOGAN STN GRANT STN100 ftGreater Downtown Denver
Suitability score
0–29
30–49
50–69
70–100
  • Already housing
  • Not screened
  • 1665 N Grant St
1665 N Grant St and the 1,000 ft of Greater Downtown Denver around it. The streets are drawn at the width of the right-of-way they run down, sidewalks included, and named, and every building on these blocks is drawn. What is left open and stippled is neither: a surface lot, a plaza or a vacant parcel. The screened buildings are colored by the ramp above, the same one the district map uses, carry their score, and each is a link to its own page. Each casts a shadow as long as its measured height lets it, so towers stand out from the low buildings around them; the unscreened buildings have no measured height and cast none. 1665 N Grant St is outlined in its own score color at the outline it covers at ground level. The inset places it among every building the screen covers.
25 ftAA50 ftDaylit 100%
Floor plan: 100% of each floor sits within daylight reach of a facade, with no dead core at all. The shading is daylight, darkest at the windows and gone 35 ft in. The dimension marks the deepest interior point, 25 ft from the nearest window. A–A is where the section beside it is cut.
Ground floor · no homesDaylit5 floors25 ft
Section A–A: cut across the depth of the plate, through the middle of the core. Daylight reaches 35 ft in from every facade, and here it meets in the middle: the plate is thin enough that no floor is left windowless. The shaded ground floor is converted like the rest and counted as no homes.

This building does not pencil at default assumptions, even with a modeled RESIDE Act grant.

This footprint has no windowless core at all: every point on the floor plate is within 35 ft of a facade, which is unusual and is the main reason it scores as well as it does.

Modeled conversion metrics for 1665 N Grant St, 2026-09-19.

Suitability scoreStrong candidate85 / 100
Storiesfrom 61 ft aerial-survey height ÷ 12 ft floor-to-floor5
Floor plateper floor, from the city footprint6,869 sq ft
Daylight efficiencyshare within 35 ft of a facade100%
Deepest interior pointviability threshold is 80 ft25 ft
Windowless coreper floor — renovated but never rentable0 sq ft
Estimated homesat 750 sq ft average29
Conversion cost$360/sq ft all-in on 27,474 sq ft$9.9M
Gap before grantshortfall against completed value$3.0M
Modeled RESIDE grantbelow the statutory cap$1.7M
BuiltDenver does not publish a construction year with this data—
ZoningNorth Capitol HillC-MX-12
Opportunity Zonenot in a 2018 designated tractNo

The plan: window line, shape and floor rhythm

79 ft of exterior wall for each home the screen estimates — enough for two- and three-bedroom homes across the plan.

The typical floor has 575 ft of exterior wall, and across 4 residential floors the building carries 2,300 ft of it in total, divided among the 29 homes this screen estimates.

Its plate is elongated at 0.26: a slab or an L, which is why so much of the floor lies within reach of a window: the outline buys daylight that a square plan of the same area would not. How window line and plate shape are measured.

At the model’s 750 sq ft average, the plan works out at about 7.3 homes per floor, repeated on every residential floor, since this building's outline does not change as it rises.

Why 1665 N Grant St scores 85 out of 100

Daylight efficiency 100, Interior depth 100, Scale 19, Finance 78 — each out of 100, then weighted.

Score components for 1665 N Grant St. Points are the subscore times its weight.

ComponentSubscoreWeightPoints
Daylight efficiency100% of the floor area within 35 ft of a facade, scored from 40% up to 90%10045%45.0
Interior depthdeepest interior point 25 ft from a facade, scored from 80 ft down to 40 ft10025%25.0
Scale29 estimated homes, scored from 0 up to 1501915%2.9
Financeremaining gap is 13% of conversion cost, scored from 60% down to 0%7815%11.7

Most of what it earns comes from daylight efficiency, and what holds it back most is scale, at 19 out of 100: 29 estimated homes, scored from 0 up to 150.

What the conversion would cost

$360 per square foot all-in across 27,474 sq ft of converted floor, or $9.9M in total — about $341K for each of the 29 homes.

All-in cost per square foot for 1665 N Grant St: base cost plus the code work a change of use triggers.

Base conversion cost$260/sq ft
Plumbing risers to every unit$40/sq ft
Operable windows and glazing$30/sq ft
Additional egress stair$18/sq ft
Fire sprinklers (NFPA 13R)$12/sq ft
All-in$360/sq ft

That cost is charged across every converted square foot, including the circulation and service area that earns nothing directly. Against it the model sets a completed value of $236K a home, which for 29 homes is $6.8M.

What would have to be true

A $3.0M gap before any grant, $1.3M after the modeled one. The smallest single change that would close it: average unit size 14% down.

The shortfall before any grant is $3.0M. Closing it from the value side means each of the 29 homes finishing at $341K rather than the $236K the model assumes — 45% more. Closing it from the cost side means getting all-in cost down from $360 to $249 per square foot.

A modeled RESIDE grant of $1.7M moves that threshold to $281K a home. That is still above the $236K assumed, leaving $1.3M uncovered, which is why the grant does not unlock this one.

Nor do all four levers have to move. For 1665 N Grant St, one alone would close the gap at:

Single-assumption flip points for 1665 N Grant St, each holding the other three at their defaults.

Average unit sizethe binding constraint — the least this building would need14% downto 646 sq ft
Circulation efficiency16% upto 93%
Conversion cost per square foot18% downto $212/sq ft
Completed value per home19% upto $281K

All four are sliders in the survey, where 1665 N Grant St re-scores against your own numbers.

How it compares in Greater Downtown Denver

1665 N Grant St ranks 59th of the 214 buildings screened here, against a median score of 72.

Its floor plate is better lit than 100% of them, and shallower than 100% of them at its deepest interior point. On size it is the 214th largest by estimated homes. The full survey of all 214 buildings ranks and maps every one of them, and the list by address links each to its own page.

Within North Capitol Hill and the C-MX-12 zone

21st of 41 in North Capitol Hill, 11th of 16 zoned C-MX-12 — the comparison that shares its rules, rents and streets.

Denver places 41 of the screened buildings in North Capitol Hill. 1665 N Grant St ranks 21st of them against a median score of 85. 32 score 70 or more, their median deepest interior point is 47 ft from a facade against this building’s 25 ft, and together they would hold an estimated 8,820 homes. The group’s top scorer is 1776 N Grant St, at 97.

16 of the screened buildings are zoned C-MX-12. 1665 N Grant St ranks 11th of them against a median score of 85. 13 score 70 or more, their median deepest interior point is 44 ft from a facade against this building’s 25 ft, and together they would hold an estimated 2,011 homes. The group’s top scorer is 1776 N Grant St, at 97.

Its nearest match in size: 2601 Blake St

The screened building closest to 1665 N Grant St in converted floor area is 2601 Blake St: 30,176 sq ft over 5 stories, against 27,474 sq ft over 5 here.

The two land within a few points of each other — 85 here, 83 there — so at this size the screen reads them as much the same prospect. On the money they sit in the same place: each falls short even with the modeled grant. The two stand about 6,300 ft apart.

Would it qualify for a RESIDE Act grant?

The model awards 1665 N Grant St $1.7M, on the assumption it qualifies. Whether it does, no published dataset can say.

That figure assumes the building meets the Act’s vacant-and-abandoned test, which turns on code-enforcement and receivership records no city publishes.

It does not sit in a 2018 designated Opportunity Zone, so it would not draw that Section 201 priority.

Other buildings screened near 1665 N Grant St

The 4 closest the screen also covers, from 130 ft away. They are the colored outlines on the plan at the top of this page.

  • 1660 N Sherman St
    12 stories · 78% daylit · 159 estimated homes · scores 72/100 (Strong candidate)
    about 130 ft away
  • 300 E 17th Ave
    12 stories · 100% daylit · 224 estimated homes · scores 96/100 (Strong candidate)
    about 270 ft away
  • 1673 N Sherman St
    7 stories · 99% daylit · 43 estimated homes · scores 84/100 (Strong candidate)
    about 340 ft away
  • 225 E 16th Ave
    15 stories · 89% daylit · 180 estimated homes · scores 88/100 (Strong candidate)
    about 380 ft away

A screen, not a feasibility study, from outlines and heights rather than plans: the method and how to correct a figure. If you know this building’s interior, you know what this model cannot see.