110 16th St

110 16th St is a 15-story building in Greater Downtown Denver with 85% of its floor area within daylight reach of a facade. This screen estimates 157 homes and scores it 82 out of 100 for office-to-residential conversion suitability.

CO-1 · Screened 2026-09-19 · Strong candidate

Build a conversion planCheck its numbers, lay out its homes and get a two-page PDF. Free.

Also addressed as 1550 Cleveland Pl: Denver’s address records place both on this one footprint.

Where 110 16th St is

Its block in Greater Downtown Denver, drawn from Denver's own building outlines and street centerlines.

Suitability score

0–29

30–49

50–69

70–100

Already housing
Not screened
110 16th St

110 16th St and the 1,000 ft of Greater Downtown Denver around it. The streets are drawn at the width of the right-of-way they run down, sidewalks included, and named, and every building on these blocks is drawn. What is left open and stippled is neither: a surface lot, a plaza or a vacant parcel. The screened buildings are colored by the ramp above, the same one the district map uses, carry their score, and each is a link to its own page. Each casts a shadow as long as its measured height lets it, so towers stand out from the low buildings around them; the unscreened buildings have no measured height and cast none. 110 16th St is outlined in its own score color at the outline it covers at ground level. Dashed inside it is the typical floor, the one the floor-plate figure below draws, because this building steps back as it rises. Its windowless core is hatched. The inset places it among every building the screen covers.

Typical floor plan: 85% of the building’s floor area sits within daylight reach of a facade; the drawing shows its typical floor, where the share is 85%. The shading is daylight, darkest at the windows and gone 35 ft in. The hatched area is windowless core: 1,997 sq ft per typical floor that must be renovated but can never be rented as an apartment. The dimension marks the deepest interior point, 51 ft from the nearest window. A–A is where the section beside it is cut.

Section A–A: cut across the depth of the plate, through the middle of the core. Daylight reaches 35 ft in from every facade, fading as it goes, and the hatched stripe left between the lit edges is floor that gets converted and can never be rented: 1,997 sq ft on the floor the screen scores, and 25,465 sq ft over 14 residential floors. The steps are where the building sets back as it rises. The shaded ground floor is converted like the rest and counted as no homes.

This building does not pencil at default assumptions, even with a modeled RESIDE Act grant.

Across its 14 residential floors this building carries 25,465 sq ft of windowless core — area that must be gutted, re-plumbed and sprinklered but can never be rented as an apartment.

Modeled conversion metrics for 110 16th St, 2026-09-19.

Suitability scoreStrong candidate	82 / 100
Storiesfrom 185 ft aerial-survey height ÷ 12 ft floor-to-floor	15
Height bandsfloor plate by floor range, from the city's roof outlines	Floor 1: 14,087 sq ft · Floors 2–13: 13,289 sq ft · Floor 14: 12,799 sq ft · Floor 15: 622 sq ft
Floor platetypical floor, from the city outlines	13,289 sq ft
Daylight efficiencyshare within 35 ft of a facade	85%
Deepest interior pointviability threshold is 80 ft	51 ft
Windowless coretypical floor; the building-wide total is in the text above	1,997 sq ft
Estimated homesat 750 sq ft average	157
Conversion cost$360/sq ft all-in on 172,888 sq ft	$62.2M
Gap before grantshortfall against completed value	$25.2M
Modeled RESIDE grantbelow the statutory cap	$9.4M
BuiltDenver does not publish a construction year with this data	—
ZoningCBD	D-C
Opportunity Zonenot in a 2018 designated tract	No

The plan: window line, shape and floor rhythm

39 ft of exterior wall for each home the screen estimates — enough for two- and three-bedroom homes across the plan.

The typical floor has 463 ft of exterior wall, and across 14 residential floors the building carries 6,144 ft of it in total, divided among the 157 homes this screen estimates.

Its plate is compact at 0.78: close to a square or a circle, the most efficient envelope an office can have and the least generous one for apartments: little perimeter to divide among homes. How window line and plate shape are measured.

At the model’s 750 sq ft average, the plan works out at about 11.2 homes per floor. Its floors are not alike, though: the typical floor's deepest interior point is 51 ft from a facade, while its worst floor reaches 54 ft. The score follows the typical floor, so a podium that could not hold a bedroom does not by itself sink a slim tower above it — but it is there, and it is part of what would have to be drawn around.

Why 110 16th St scores 82 out of 100

Daylight efficiency 91, Interior depth 72, Scale 100, Finance 58 — each out of 100, then weighted.

Score components for 110 16th St. Points are the subscore times its weight.

Component	Subscore	Weight	Points
Daylight efficiency85% of the floor area within 35 ft of a facade, scored from 40% up to 90%	91	45%	40.7
Interior depthdeepest interior point 51 ft from a facade, scored from 80 ft down to 40 ft	72	25%	18.0
Scale157 estimated homes, scored from 0 up to 150	100	15%	15.0
Financeremaining gap is 25% of conversion cost, scored from 60% down to 0%	58	15%	8.7

Most of what it earns comes from daylight efficiency, and what holds it back most is finance, at 58 out of 100: remaining gap is 25% of conversion cost, scored from 60% down to 0%.

What the conversion would cost

$360 per square foot all-in across 172,888 sq ft of converted floor, or $62.2M in total — about $396K for each of the 157 homes.

All-in cost per square foot for 110 16th St: base cost plus the code work a change of use triggers.

Base conversion cost	$260/sq ft
Plumbing risers to every unit	$40/sq ft
Operable windows and glazing	$30/sq ft
Additional egress stair	$18/sq ft
Fire sprinklers (NFPA 13R)	$12/sq ft
All-in	$360/sq ft

That cost is charged across every converted square foot, including the 25,465 sq ft of windowless core, which has to be gutted, re-plumbed and sprinklered like the rest of the building and then earns nothing. Against it the model sets a completed value of $236K a home, which for 157 homes is $37.1M.

What would have to be true

A $25.2M gap before any grant, $15.8M after the modeled one. The smallest single change that would close it: average unit size 29% down.

The shortfall before any grant is $25.2M. Closing it from the value side means each of the 157 homes finishing at $396K rather than the $236K the model assumes — 68% more. Closing it from the cost side means getting all-in cost down from $360 to $214 per square foot.

A modeled RESIDE grant of $9.4M moves that threshold to $336K a home. That is still above the $236K assumed, leaving $15.8M uncovered, which is why the grant does not unlock this one.

Nor do all four levers have to move. For 110 16th St, one alone would close the gap at:

Single-assumption flip points for 110 16th St, each holding the other three at their defaults.

Average unit sizethe binding constraint — the least this building would need	29% downto 531 sq ft
Conversion cost per square foot	35% downto $169/sq ft
Completed value per home	43% upto $336K

All four are sliders in the survey, where 110 16th St re-scores against your own numbers.

How it compares in Greater Downtown Denver

110 16th St ranks 68th of the 214 buildings screened here, against a median score of 72.

Its floor plate is better lit than 58% of them, and shallower than 62% of them at its deepest interior point. On size it is the 129th largest by estimated homes. The full survey of all 214 buildings ranks and maps every one of them, and the list by address links each to its own page.

Within CBD and the D-C zone

23rd of 75 in CBD, 21st of 72 zoned D-C — the comparison that shares its rules, rents and streets.

Denver places 75 of the screened buildings in CBD. 110 16th St ranks 23rd of them against a median score of 71. 40 score 70 or more, their median deepest interior point is 56 ft from a facade against this building’s 51 ft, and together they would hold an estimated 33,698 homes. The group’s top scorer is 918 17th St, at 97.

72 of the screened buildings are zoned D-C. 110 16th St ranks 21st of them against a median score of 73. 39 score 70 or more, their median deepest interior point is 57 ft from a facade against this building’s 51 ft, and together they would hold an estimated 32,881 homes. The group’s top scorer is 721 19th St, at 95.

Its nearest match in size: 1900 N Grant St

The screened building closest to 110 16th St in converted floor area is 1900 N Grant St: 171,982 sq ft over 14 stories, against 172,888 sq ft over 15 here.

110 16th St scores 82 to its 86, and with the size held roughly equal most of that shortfall comes from interior depth: 72 out of 100 here, 82 there (deepest interior point 47 ft from a facade, scored from 80 ft down to 40 ft). On the money they sit in the same place: each falls short even with the modeled grant. The two stand about 2,300 ft apart.

Would it qualify for a RESIDE Act grant?

The model awards 110 16th St $9.4M, on the assumption it qualifies. Whether it does, no published dataset can say.

That figure assumes the building meets the Act’s vacant-and-abandoned test, which turns on code-enforcement and receivership records no city publishes.

It does not sit in a 2018 designated Opportunity Zone, so it would not draw that Section 201 priority.

Other buildings screened near 110 16th St

The 4 closest the screen also covers, from 240 ft away. They are the colored outlines on the plan at the top of this page.

101 W Colfax Ave
14 stories · 66% daylit · 406 estimated homes · scores 35/100 (Marginal)
about 240 ft away
1625 N Broadway
32 stories · 80% daylit · 358 estimated homes · scores 69/100 (Worth a feasibility study)
about 290 ft away
1600 N Broadway
29 stories · 75% daylit · 503 estimated homes · scores 64/100 (Worth a feasibility study)
about 330 ft away
1550 N Broadway
24 stories · 75% daylit · 534 estimated homes · scores 56/100 (Worth a feasibility study)
about 330 ft away

A screen, not a feasibility study, from outlines and heights rather than plans: the method and how to correct a figure. If you know this building’s interior, you know what this model cannot see.