340 Mission St
340 Mission St is a 30-story building in Downtown San Francisco with 75% of its floor area within daylight reach of a facade. This screen estimates 449 homes and scores it 63 out of 100 for office-to-residential conversion suitability.
CA-11 · Screened 2026-10-12 · Worth a feasibility study
Also addressed as 350 Mission St: San Francisco’s address records place both on this one footprint.
Where 340 Mission St is
Its block in Downtown San Francisco, drawn from San Francisco's own building outlines and street centerlines.
- Already housing
- Not screened
- 340 Mission St
This building does not pencil at default assumptions, even with a modeled RESIDE Act grant.
Every floor carries 4,779 sq ft of windowless core — area that must be gutted, seismically braced and sprinklered but can never be rented as an apartment. Across 29 residential floors that is 138,594 sq ft of cost carrying no revenue.
Modeled conversion metrics for 340 Mission St, 2026-10-12.
| Suitability scoreWorth a feasibility study | 63 / 100 |
|---|---|
| Storiesfrom 384 ft LiDAR (2010) height ÷ 12 ft floor-to-floor | 30 |
| Floor plateper floor, from the city footprint | 19,324 sq ft |
| Daylight efficiencyshare within 35 ft of a facade | 75% |
| Deepest interior pointviability threshold is 80 ft | 69 ft |
| Windowless coreper floor — renovated but never rentable | 4,779 sq ft |
| Estimated homesat 750 sq ft average | 449 |
| Conversion cost$405/sq ft all-in on 560,386 sq ft | $227.0M |
| Gap before grantshortfall against completed value | $62.6M |
| Modeled RESIDE grantat the statutory per-award cap | $10.0M |
| BuiltSan Francisco's own record of the construction year | 2015 |
| ZoningFinancial District/South Beach | C-3-O(SD) |
| Opportunity Zonenot in a 2018 designated tract | No |
The plan: window line, shape and floor rhythm
36 ft of exterior wall for each home the screen estimates — enough for two- and three-bedroom homes across the plan.
The typical floor has 557 ft of exterior wall, and across 29 residential floors the building carries 16,142 ft of it in total, divided among the 449 homes this screen estimates.
Its plate is compact at 0.78: close to a square or a circle, the most efficient envelope an office can have and the least generous one for apartments: little perimeter to divide among homes. How window line and plate shape are measured.
At the model’s 750 sq ft average, the plan works out at about 15.5 homes per floor, repeated on every residential floor, since this building's outline does not change as it rises.
Why 340 Mission St scores 63 out of 100
Daylight efficiency 71, Interior depth 27, Scale 100, Finance 61 — each out of 100, then weighted.
Score components for 340 Mission St. Points are the subscore times its weight.
| Component | Subscore | Weight | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daylight efficiency75% of the floor area within 35 ft of a facade, scored from 40% up to 90% | 71 | 45% | 31.7 |
| Interior depthdeepest interior point 69 ft from a facade, scored from 80 ft down to 40 ft | 27 | 25% | 6.8 |
| Scale449 estimated homes, scored from 0 up to 150 | 100 | 15% | 15.0 |
| Financeremaining gap is 23% of conversion cost, scored from 60% down to 0% | 61 | 15% | 9.2 |
Most of what it earns comes from daylight efficiency, and what holds it back most is interior depth, at 27 out of 100: deepest interior point 69 ft from a facade, scored from 80 ft down to 40 ft.
Built in 2015
San Francisco records this building as going up in 2015, which puts it in the modern stock.
As a rule, newer systems and better structure, but usually built deep and sealed for office use, and rarely cheap enough to buy at a price that lets a conversion pencil. That is the era’s general tendency rather than a finding about this building — the model reads an outline and a height, and can see nothing inside — but it is the first thing an architect would want to know, and it colours how much confidence the 75% daylight figure above deserves.
What the conversion would cost
$405 per square foot all-in across 560,386 sq ft of converted floor, or $227.0M in total — about $505K for each of the 449 homes.
All-in cost per square foot for 340 Mission St: base cost plus the code work a change of use triggers.
| Base conversion cost | $260/sq ft |
|---|---|
| Seismic retrofit (change of use) | $45/sq ft |
| Plumbing risers to every unit | $40/sq ft |
| Operable windows and glazing | $30/sq ft |
| Additional egress stair | $18/sq ft |
| Fire sprinklers (NFPA 13R) | $12/sq ft |
| All-in | $405/sq ft |
That cost is charged across every converted square foot, including the 138,594 sq ft of windowless core, which has to be gutted, seismically braced and sprinklered like the rest of the building and then earns nothing. Against it the model sets a completed value of $366K a home, which for 449 homes is $164.3M.
What would have to be true
A $62.6M gap before any grant, $52.6M after the modeled one. The smallest single change that would close it: average unit size 24% down.
The shortfall before any grant is $62.6M. Closing it from the value side means each of the 449 homes finishing at $505K rather than the $366K the model assumes — 38% more. Closing it from the cost side means getting all-in cost down from $405 to $293 per square foot.
A modeled RESIDE grant of $10.0M moves that threshold to $483K a home. That is still above the $366K assumed, leaving $52.6M uncovered, which is why the grant does not unlock this one.
Nor do all four levers have to move. For 340 Mission St, one alone would close the gap at:
Single-assumption flip points for 340 Mission St, each holding the other three at their defaults.
| Average unit sizethe binding constraint — the least this building would need | 24% downto 569 sq ft |
|---|---|
| Completed value per home | 32% upto $483K |
| Conversion cost per square foot | 36% downto $166/sq ft |
All four are sliders in the survey, where 340 Mission St re-scores against your own numbers.
How it compares in Downtown San Francisco
340 Mission St ranks 167th of the 205 buildings screened here, against a median score of 87.
Its floor plate is better lit than 21% of them, and shallower than 12% of them at its deepest interior point. On size it is the 25th largest by estimated homes. The full survey of all 205 buildings ranks and maps every one of them, and the list by address links each to its own page.
Within Financial District/South Beach and the C-3-O(SD) zone
136th of 165 in Financial District/South Beach, 46th of 66 zoned C-3-O(SD) — the comparison that shares its rules, rents and streets.
San Francisco places 165 of the screened buildings in Financial District/South Beach. 340 Mission St ranks 136th of them against a median score of 88. 121 score 70 or more, their median deepest interior point is 47 ft from a facade against this building’s 69 ft, and together they would hold an estimated 40,456 homes. The group’s top scorer is 870 Market St, at 100.
66 of the screened buildings are zoned C-3-O(SD). 340 Mission St ranks 46th of them against a median score of 72. 37 score 70 or more, their median deepest interior point is 59 ft from a facade against this building’s 69 ft, and together they would hold an estimated 18,546 homes. The group’s top scorer is 140 New Montgomery St, at 100.
Its nearest match in size: 1 2nd St
The screened building closest to 340 Mission St in converted floor area is 1 2nd St: 587,275 sq ft over 31 stories, against 560,386 sq ft over 30 here.
The two land within a few points of each other — 63 here, 63 there — so at this size the screen reads them as much the same prospect. On the money they sit in the same place: each falls short even with the modeled grant. The two stand about 1,300 ft apart.
Would it qualify for a RESIDE Act grant?
The model awards 340 Mission St $10.0M, on the assumption it qualifies. Whether it does, no published dataset can say.
That figure assumes the building meets the Act’s vacant-and-abandoned test, which turns on code-enforcement and receivership records no city publishes.
It does not sit in a 2018 designated Opportunity Zone, so it would not draw that Section 201 priority.
Other buildings screened near 340 Mission St
The 4 closest the screen also covers, from 150 ft away. They are the colored outlines on the plan at the top of this page.
- 50 Beale St24 stories · 69% daylit · 496 estimated homes · scores 59/100 (Worth a feasibility study)about 150 ft away
- 45 Fremont St34 stories · 76% daylit · 511 estimated homes · scores 69/100 (Worth a feasibility study)about 190 ft away
- 75 1st St42 stories · 73% daylit · 671 estimated homes · scores 64/100 (Worth a feasibility study)about 210 ft away
- 440 Mission St5 stories · 82% daylit · 51 estimated homes · scores 70/100 (Strong candidate)about 360 ft away
A screen, not a feasibility study, from outlines and heights rather than plans: the method and how to correct a figure. If you know this building’s interior, you know what this model cannot see.