2001 16th St

2001 16th St is a 22-story building in Greater Downtown Denver with 71% of its floor area within daylight reach of a facade. This screen estimates 494 homes and scores it 58 out of 100 for office-to-residential conversion suitability.

CO-1 · Screened 2026-09-19 · Worth a feasibility study

Build a conversion planCheck its numbers, lay out its homes and get a two-page PDF. Free.

Also addressed as 2020 17th St, 2030 17th St, 1681 Chestnut Pl and 1691 Chestnut Pl: Denver’s address records place all 5 on this one footprint.

Where 2001 16th St is

Its block in Greater Downtown Denver, drawn from Denver's own building outlines and street centerlines.

1900 17th St: scores 91 out of 1001777 Chestnut Pl: scores 91 out of 1001604 Little Raven St: already housing2005 17th St: scores 87 out of 1002100 16th St: already housing1650 Wewatta St: already housing1589 Bassett Cir: already housing1900 16th St: scores 62 out of 1001989 16th St: scores 59 out of 1002000 16th St: scores 51 out of 1009187595158CHESTNUT PL17TH STBASSETT CIRN100 ftGreater Downtown Denver
Suitability score
0–29
30–49
50–69
70–100
  • Already housing
  • Not screened
  • 2001 16th St
2001 16th St and the 1,000 ft of Greater Downtown Denver around it. The streets are drawn at the width of the right-of-way they run down, sidewalks included, and named, and every building on these blocks is drawn. What is left open and stippled is neither: a surface lot, a plaza or a vacant parcel. The screened buildings are colored by the ramp above, the same one the district map uses, carry their score, and each is a link to its own page. Each casts a shadow as long as its measured height lets it, so towers stand out from the low buildings around them; the unscreened buildings have no measured height and cast none. 2001 16th St is outlined in its own score color at the outline it covers at ground level. Dashed inside it is the typical floor, the one the floor-plate figure below draws, because this building steps back as it rises. Its windowless core is hatched. The inset places it among every building the screen covers.
63 ftAA100 ftDaylit 68%Core 12,818 sq ft
Typical floor plan: 71% of the building’s floor area sits within daylight reach of a facade; the drawing shows its typical floor, where the share is 68%. The shading is daylight, darkest at the windows and gone 35 ft in. The hatched area is windowless core: 12,818 sq ft per typical floor that must be renovated but can never be rented as an apartment. The dimension marks the deepest interior point, 63 ft from the nearest window. A–A is where the section beside it is cut.
Daylit22 floors50 ft
Section A–A: cut across the depth of the plate, through the middle of the core. Daylight reaches 35 ft in from every facade, fading as it goes, and the hatched stripe left between the lit edges is floor that gets converted and can never be rented: 12,818 sq ft on the floor the screen scores, and 185,491 sq ft over 21 residential floors. The steps are where the building sets back as it rises. The shaded ground floor is converted like the rest and counted as no homes.

This building does not pencil at default assumptions, even with a modeled RESIDE Act grant.

Across its 21 residential floors this building carries 185,491 sq ft of windowless core — area that must be gutted, re-plumbed and sprinklered but can never be rented as an apartment.

Modeled conversion metrics for 2001 16th St, 2026-09-19.

Suitability scoreWorth a feasibility study58 / 100
Storiesfrom 268 ft aerial-survey height ÷ 12 ft floor-to-floor22
Height bandsfloor plate by floor range, from the city's roof outlinesFloors 1–7: 39,736 sq ft · Floors 8–12: 37,134 sq ft · Floor 13: 25,023 sq ft · Floors 14–21: 23,936 sq ft · Floor 22: 8,386 sq ft
Floor platetypical floor, from the city outlines39,736 sq ft
Daylight efficiencyshare within 35 ft of a facade71%
Deepest interior pointviability threshold is 80 ft63 ft
Windowless coretypical floor; the building-wide total is in the text above12,818 sq ft
Estimated homesat 750 sq ft average494
Conversion cost$360/sq ft all-in on 648,985 sq ft$233.6M
Gap before grantshortfall against completed value$117.1M
Modeled RESIDE grantat the statutory per-award cap$10.0M
BuiltDenver does not publish a construction year with this data—
ZoningUnion StationC-MX-20
Opportunity Zonenot in a 2018 designated tractNo

The plan: window line, shape and floor rhythm

34 ft of exterior wall for each home the screen estimates — enough for two- and three-bedroom homes across the plan.

The typical floor has 929 ft of exterior wall, and across 21 residential floors the building carries 16,725 ft of it in total, divided among the 494 homes this screen estimates.

Its plate is moderately compact at 0.58: a squarish plan, with enough perimeter for a conventional double-loaded corridor. How window line and plate shape are measured.

At the model’s 750 sq ft average, the plan works out at about 23.5 homes per floor, repeated on every residential floor, since this building's outline does not change as it rises.

Why 2001 16th St scores 58 out of 100

Daylight efficiency 63, Interior depth 43, Scale 100, Finance 24 — each out of 100, then weighted.

Score components for 2001 16th St. Points are the subscore times its weight.

ComponentSubscoreWeightPoints
Daylight efficiency71% of the floor area within 35 ft of a facade, scored from 40% up to 90%6345%28.3
Interior depthdeepest interior point 63 ft from a facade, scored from 80 ft down to 40 ft4325%10.7
Scale494 estimated homes, scored from 0 up to 15010015%15.0
Financeremaining gap is 46% of conversion cost, scored from 60% down to 0%2415%3.5

Most of what it earns comes from daylight efficiency, and what holds it back most is finance, at 24 out of 100: remaining gap is 46% of conversion cost, scored from 60% down to 0%.

What the conversion would cost

$360 per square foot all-in across 648,985 sq ft of converted floor, or $233.6M in total — about $473K for each of the 494 homes.

All-in cost per square foot for 2001 16th St: base cost plus the code work a change of use triggers.

Base conversion cost$260/sq ft
Plumbing risers to every unit$40/sq ft
Operable windows and glazing$30/sq ft
Additional egress stair$18/sq ft
Fire sprinklers (NFPA 13R)$12/sq ft
All-in$360/sq ft

That cost is charged across every converted square foot, including the 185,491 sq ft of windowless core, which has to be gutted, re-plumbed and sprinklered like the rest of the building and then earns nothing. Against it the model sets a completed value of $236K a home, which for 494 homes is $116.6M.

What would have to be true

A $117.1M gap before any grant, $107.1M after the modeled one. The smallest single change that would close it: average unit size 48% down.

The shortfall before any grant is $117.1M. Closing it from the value side means each of the 494 homes finishing at $473K rather than the $236K the model assumes — 100% more. Closing it from the cost side means getting all-in cost down from $360 to $180 per square foot.

A modeled RESIDE grant of $10.0M moves that threshold to $453K a home. That is still above the $236K assumed, leaving $107.1M uncovered, which is why the grant does not unlock this one.

Nor do all four levers have to move. For 2001 16th St, one alone would close the gap at:

Single-assumption flip points for 2001 16th St, each holding the other three at their defaults.

Average unit sizethe binding constraint — the least this building would need48% downto 391 sq ft
Conversion cost per square foot63% downto $95/sq ft
Completed value per home92% upto $453K

All four are sliders in the survey, where 2001 16th St re-scores against your own numbers.

How it compares in Greater Downtown Denver

2001 16th St ranks 177th of the 214 buildings screened here, against a median score of 72.

Its floor plate is better lit than 18% of them, and shallower than 21% of them at its deepest interior point. On size it is the 39th largest by estimated homes. The full survey of all 214 buildings ranks and maps every one of them, and the list by address links each to its own page.

Within Union Station

47th of 55 in Union Station — the comparison that shares its rules, rents and streets.

Denver places 55 of the screened buildings in Union Station. 2001 16th St ranks 47th of them against a median score of 69. 23 score 70 or more, their median deepest interior point is 61 ft from a facade against this building’s 63 ft, and together they would hold an estimated 13,167 homes. The group’s top scorer is 1600 17th St, at 95.

Its nearest match in size: 1929 Stout St

The screened building closest to 2001 16th St in converted floor area is 1929 Stout St: 693,970 sq ft over 22 stories, against 648,985 sq ft over 22 here.

2001 16th St scores 58 to its 69, and with the size held roughly equal most of that shortfall comes from interior depth: 43 out of 100 here, 73 there (deepest interior point 51 ft from a facade, scored from 80 ft down to 40 ft). On the money they sit in the same place: each falls short even with the modeled grant. The two stand about 4,300 ft apart.

Would it qualify for a RESIDE Act grant?

The model awards 2001 16th St $10.0M, on the assumption it qualifies. Whether it does, no published dataset can say.

That figure assumes the building meets the Act’s vacant-and-abandoned test, which turns on code-enforcement and receivership records no city publishes.

It does not sit in a 2018 designated Opportunity Zone, so it would not draw that Section 201 priority.

Other buildings screened near 2001 16th St

The 4 closest the screen also covers, from 260 ft away. They are the colored outlines on the plan at the top of this page.

  • 1989 16th St
    13 stories · 71% daylit · 254 estimated homes · scores 59/100 (Worth a feasibility study)
    about 260 ft away
  • 1900 17th St
    13 stories · 91% daylit · 253 estimated homes · scores 91/100 (Strong candidate)
    about 280 ft away
  • 1604 Little Raven St
    8 stories · 93% daylit · already a condominium building
    about 350 ft away
  • 2005 17th St
    12 stories · 86% daylit · 144 estimated homes · scores 87/100 (Strong candidate)
    about 400 ft away

A screen, not a feasibility study, from outlines and heights rather than plans: the method and how to correct a figure. If you know this building’s interior, you know what this model cannot see.