734 Sansom St

734 Sansom St is a 6-story building in Center City Philadelphia with 95% of its floor area within daylight reach of a facade. This screen estimates 42 homes and scores it 79 out of 100 for office-to-residential conversion suitability.

PA-2 & PA-3 · Screened 2026-09-15 · Strong candidate

Build a conversion planCheck its numbers, lay out its homes and get a two-page PDF. Free.

Also addressed as 736 Sansom St, 738 Sansom St, 740 Sansom St and 742 Sansom St: Philadelphia’s address records place all 5 on this one footprint.

Where 734 Sansom St is

Its block in Center City Philadelphia, drawn from Philadelphia's own building outlines and street centerlines.

700 Chestnut St: scores 83 out of 100615 Chestnut St: scores 36 out of 100105 S 7th St: scores 33 out of 100170 S Independence Mall W: scores 18 out of 1001879IONIC STSANSOM STWALNUT STS 8TH STS 7TH STN100 ftCenter City Philadelphia
Suitability score
0–29
30–49
50–69
70–100
  • Already housing
  • Not screened
  • 734 Sansom St
734 Sansom St and the 1,000 ft of Center City Philadelphia around it. The streets are drawn at the width of the right-of-way they run down, sidewalks included, and named, and every building on these blocks is drawn. What is left open and stippled is neither: a surface lot, a plaza or a vacant parcel. The screened buildings are colored by the ramp above, the same one the district map uses, carry their score, and each is a link to its own page. Each casts a shadow as long as its measured height lets it, so towers stand out from the low buildings around them; the unscreened buildings have no measured height and cast none. 734 Sansom St is outlined in its own score color at the outline it covers at ground level. Its windowless core is hatched. The inset places it among every building the screen covers.
45 ftAA25 ftDaylit 95%Core 431 sq ft
Floor plan: 95% of each floor sits within daylight reach of a facade. The shading is daylight, darkest at the windows and gone 35 ft in. The hatched area is windowless core: 431 sq ft per floor that must be renovated but can never be rented as an apartment. The dimension marks the deepest interior point, 45 ft from the nearest window. A–A is where the section beside it is cut.
No homesWindowless coreDaylit6 floors25 ft
Section A–A: cut across the depth of the plate, through the middle of the core. Daylight reaches 35 ft in from every facade, fading as it goes, and the hatched stripe left between the lit edges is floor that gets converted and can never be rented: 431 sq ft on the floor the screen scores, and 2,156 sq ft over 5 residential floors. The shaded ground floor is converted like the rest and counted as no homes.

This building does not pencil at default assumptions, even with a modeled RESIDE Act grant.

Every floor carries 431 sq ft of windowless core — area that must be gutted, re-plumbed and sprinklered but can never be rented as an apartment. Across 5 residential floors that is 2,156 sq ft of cost carrying no revenue.

Modeled conversion metrics for 734 Sansom St, 2026-09-15.

Suitability scoreStrong candidate79 / 100
Storiesfrom 81 ft LiDAR height ÷ 12 ft floor-to-floor6
Floor plateper floor, from the city footprint8,409 sq ft
Daylight efficiencyshare within 35 ft of a facade95%
Deepest interior pointviability threshold is 80 ft45 ft
Windowless coreper floor — renovated but never rentable431 sq ft
Estimated homesat 750 sq ft average42
Conversion cost$360/sq ft all-in on 42,043 sq ft$15.1M
Gap before grantshortfall against completed value$6.9M
Modeled RESIDE grantbelow the statutory cap$2.5M
BuiltPhiladelphia's own record of the construction year1925
ZoningCenter City PhiladelphiaCMX5
Opportunity Zonenot in a 2018 designated tractNo

The plan: window line, shape and floor rhythm

45 ft of exterior wall for each home the screen estimates — enough for two- and three-bedroom homes across the plan.

The typical floor has 379 ft of exterior wall, and across 5 residential floors the building carries 1,897 ft of it in total, divided among the 42 homes this screen estimates.

Its plate is compact at 0.73: close to a square or a circle, the most efficient envelope an office can have and the least generous one for apartments: little perimeter to divide among homes. How window line and plate shape are measured.

At the model’s 750 sq ft average, the plan works out at about 8.4 homes per floor, repeated on every residential floor, since this building's outline does not change as it rises.

Why 734 Sansom St scores 79 out of 100

Daylight efficiency 100, Interior depth 87, Scale 28, Finance 52 — each out of 100, then weighted.

Score components for 734 Sansom St. Points are the subscore times its weight.

ComponentSubscoreWeightPoints
Daylight efficiency95% of the floor area within 35 ft of a facade, scored from 40% up to 90%10045%45.0
Interior depthdeepest interior point 45 ft from a facade, scored from 80 ft down to 40 ft8725%21.8
Scale42 estimated homes, scored from 0 up to 1502815%4.2
Financeremaining gap is 29% of conversion cost, scored from 60% down to 0%5215%7.8

Most of what it earns comes from daylight efficiency, and what holds it back most is scale, at 28 out of 100: 42 estimated homes, scored from 0 up to 150.

Built in 1925

Philadelphia records this building as going up in 1925, which puts it in the interwar stock.

As a rule, steel or concrete frames with punched windows and plates still narrow enough for daylight to reach the middle, often with high ceilings. Among the most convertible stock there is, and the reason so many early conversions were of buildings this age. That is the era’s general tendency rather than a finding about this building — the model reads an outline and a height, and can see nothing inside — but it is the first thing an architect would want to know, and it colours how much confidence the 95% daylight figure above deserves.

What the conversion would cost

$360 per square foot all-in across 42,043 sq ft of converted floor, or $15.1M in total — about $360K for each of the 42 homes.

All-in cost per square foot for 734 Sansom St: base cost plus the code work a change of use triggers.

Base conversion cost$260/sq ft
Plumbing risers to every unit$40/sq ft
Operable windows and glazing$30/sq ft
Additional egress stair$18/sq ft
Fire sprinklers (NFPA 13R)$12/sq ft
All-in$360/sq ft

That cost is charged across every converted square foot, including the 2,156 sq ft of windowless core, which has to be gutted, re-plumbed and sprinklered like the rest of the building and then earns nothing. Against it the model sets a completed value of $197K a home, which for 42 homes is $8.3M.

What would have to be true

A $6.9M gap before any grant, $4.4M after the modeled one. The smallest single change that would close it: average unit size 28% down.

The shortfall before any grant is $6.9M. Closing it from the value side means each of the 42 homes finishing at $360K rather than the $197K the model assumes — 83% more. Closing it from the cost side means getting all-in cost down from $360 to $196 per square foot.

A modeled RESIDE grant of $2.5M moves that threshold to $300K a home. That is still above the $197K assumed, leaving $4.4M uncovered, which is why the grant does not unlock this one.

Nor do all four levers have to move. For 734 Sansom St, one alone would close the gap at:

Single-assumption flip points for 734 Sansom St, each holding the other three at their defaults.

Average unit sizethe binding constraint — the least this building would need28% downto 541 sq ft
Conversion cost per square foot40% downto $156/sq ft
Completed value per home53% upto $300K

All four are sliders in the survey, where 734 Sansom St re-scores against your own numbers.

How it compares in Center City Philadelphia

734 Sansom St ranks 38th of the 103 buildings screened here, against a median score of 67.

Its floor plate is better lit than 74% of them, and shallower than 68% of them at its deepest interior point. On size it is the 90th largest by estimated homes. The full survey of all 103 buildings ranks and maps every one of them, and the list by address links each to its own page.

Within the CMX5 zone

28th of 65 zoned CMX5 — the comparison that shares its rules, rents and streets.

65 of the screened buildings are zoned CMX5. 734 Sansom St ranks 28th of them against a median score of 67. 28 score 70 or more, their median deepest interior point is 58 ft from a facade against this building’s 45 ft, and together they would hold an estimated 30,650 homes. The group’s top scorer is 112 N Broad St, at 93.

Its nearest match in size: 319 N 11th St

The screened building closest to 734 Sansom St in converted floor area is 319 N 11th St: 44,302 sq ft over 6 stories, against 42,043 sq ft over 6 here.

734 Sansom St scores 79 to its 82, and with the size held roughly equal most of that shortfall comes from interior depth: 87 out of 100 here, 99 there (deepest interior point 40 ft from a facade, scored from 80 ft down to 40 ft). On the money they sit in the same place: each falls short even with the modeled grant. The two stand about 3,600 ft apart.

Would it qualify for a RESIDE Act grant?

The model awards 734 Sansom St $2.5M, on the assumption it qualifies. Whether it does, no published dataset can say.

That figure assumes the building meets the Act’s vacant-and-abandoned test, which turns on code-enforcement and receivership records no city publishes.

It does not sit in a 2018 designated Opportunity Zone, so it would not draw that Section 201 priority.

Other buildings screened near 734 Sansom St

The 4 closest the screen also covers, from 440 ft away. They are the colored outlines on the plan at the top of this page.

  • 700 Chestnut St
    6 stories · 100% daylit · 36 estimated homes · scores 83/100 (Strong candidate)
    about 440 ft away
  • 105 S 7th St
    4 stories · 63% daylit · 66 estimated homes · scores 33/100 (Marginal)
    about 550 ft away
  • 170 S Independence Mall W
    12 stories · 43% daylit · 476 estimated homes · scores 18/100 (Unlikely)
    about 600 ft away
  • 819 Chestnut St
    12 stories · 58% daylit · 282 estimated homes · scores 32/100 (Marginal)
    about 620 ft away

A screen, not a feasibility study, from outlines and heights rather than plans: the method and how to correct a figure. If you know this building’s interior, you know what this model cannot see.