325 Chestnut St

325 Chestnut St is a 13-story building in Center City Philadelphia with 87% of its floor area within daylight reach of a facade. This screen estimates 211 homes and scores it 80 out of 100 for office-to-residential conversion suitability.

PA-2 & PA-3 · Screened 2026-09-15 · Strong candidate

Build a conversion planCheck its numbers, lay out its homes and get a two-page PDF. Free.

Also addressed as 327 Chestnut St, 329 Chestnut St, 331 Chestnut St, 333 Chestnut St, 335 Chestnut St, 337 Chestnut St, 339 Chestnut St and 341 Chestnut St: Philadelphia’s address records place all 9 on this one footprint.

Where 325 Chestnut St is

Its block in Center City Philadelphia, drawn from Philadelphia's own building outlines and street centerlines.

232 Market St: scores 83 out of 100330 Market St: scores 53 out of 10080CHESTNUT STRANSTEAD STS 3RD STS 4TH STN100 ftCenter City Philadelphia
Suitability score
0–29
30–49
50–69
70–100
  • Already housing
  • Not screened
  • 325 Chestnut St
325 Chestnut St and the 1,000 ft of Center City Philadelphia around it. The streets are drawn at the width of the right-of-way they run down, sidewalks included, and named, and every building on these blocks is drawn. What is left open and stippled is neither: a surface lot, a plaza or a vacant parcel. The screened buildings are colored by the ramp above, the same one the district map uses, carry their score, and each is a link to its own page. Each casts a shadow as long as its measured height lets it, so towers stand out from the low buildings around them; the unscreened buildings have no measured height and cast none. 325 Chestnut St is outlined in its own score color at the outline it covers at ground level. Its windowless core is hatched. The inset places it among every building the screen covers.
52 ftAA50 ftDaylit 87%Core 2,555 sq ft
Floor plan: 87% of each floor sits within daylight reach of a facade. The shading is daylight, darkest at the windows and gone 35 ft in. The hatched area is windowless core: 2,555 sq ft per floor that must be renovated but can never be rented as an apartment. The dimension marks the deepest interior point, 52 ft from the nearest window. A–A is where the section beside it is cut.
Ground floor · no homesWindowless coreDaylit13 floors50 ft
Section A–A: cut across the depth of the plate, through the middle of the core. Daylight reaches 35 ft in from every facade, fading as it goes, and the hatched stripe left between the lit edges is floor that gets converted and can never be rented: 2,555 sq ft on the floor the screen scores, and 30,654 sq ft over 12 residential floors. The shaded ground floor is converted like the rest and counted as no homes.

This building does not pencil at default assumptions, even with a modeled RESIDE Act grant.

Every floor carries 2,555 sq ft of windowless core — area that must be gutted, re-plumbed and sprinklered but can never be rented as an apartment. Across 12 residential floors that is 30,654 sq ft of cost carrying no revenue.

Modeled conversion metrics for 325 Chestnut St, 2026-09-15.

Suitability scoreStrong candidate80 / 100
Storiesfrom 186 ft LiDAR height ÷ 12 ft floor-to-floor13
Floor plateper floor, from the city footprint19,048 sq ft
Daylight efficiencyshare within 35 ft of a facade87%
Deepest interior pointviability threshold is 80 ft52 ft
Windowless coreper floor — renovated but never rentable2,555 sq ft
Estimated homesat 750 sq ft average211
Conversion cost$360/sq ft all-in on 228,576 sq ft$82.3M
Gap before grantshortfall against completed value$40.8M
Modeled RESIDE grantat the statutory per-award cap$10.0M
BuiltPhiladelphia's own record of the construction year1956
ZoningCenter City PhiladelphiaCMX4
Opportunity Zonenot in a 2018 designated tractNo

The plan: window line, shape and floor rhythm

36 ft of exterior wall for each home the screen estimates — enough for two- and three-bedroom homes across the plan.

The typical floor has 627 ft of exterior wall, and across 12 residential floors the building carries 7,523 ft of it in total, divided among the 211 homes this screen estimates.

Its plate is moderately compact at 0.61: a squarish plan, with enough perimeter for a conventional double-loaded corridor. How window line and plate shape are measured.

At the model’s 750 sq ft average, the plan works out at about 17.6 homes per floor, repeated on every residential floor, since this building's outline does not change as it rises.

Why 325 Chestnut St scores 80 out of 100

Daylight efficiency 93, Interior depth 70, Scale 100, Finance 38 — each out of 100, then weighted.

Score components for 325 Chestnut St. Points are the subscore times its weight.

ComponentSubscoreWeightPoints
Daylight efficiency87% of the floor area within 35 ft of a facade, scored from 40% up to 90%9345%41.9
Interior depthdeepest interior point 52 ft from a facade, scored from 80 ft down to 40 ft7025%17.6
Scale211 estimated homes, scored from 0 up to 15010015%15.0
Financeremaining gap is 37% of conversion cost, scored from 60% down to 0%3815%5.6

Most of what it earns comes from daylight efficiency, and what holds it back most is finance, at 38 out of 100: remaining gap is 37% of conversion cost, scored from 60% down to 0%.

Built in 1956

Philadelphia records this building as going up in 1956, which puts it in the post-war stock.

As a rule, the period when plates got deep and facades became curtain wall: sealed glazing, lower floor-to-floor heights, and mechanical systems designed around a sealed box. Conversions here usually turn on whether the windows can be made to open and whether ceilings survive new plumbing. That is the era’s general tendency rather than a finding about this building — the model reads an outline and a height, and can see nothing inside — but it is the first thing an architect would want to know, and it colours how much confidence the 87% daylight figure above deserves.

What the conversion would cost

$360 per square foot all-in across 228,576 sq ft of converted floor, or $82.3M in total — about $390K for each of the 211 homes.

All-in cost per square foot for 325 Chestnut St: base cost plus the code work a change of use triggers.

Base conversion cost$260/sq ft
Plumbing risers to every unit$40/sq ft
Operable windows and glazing$30/sq ft
Additional egress stair$18/sq ft
Fire sprinklers (NFPA 13R)$12/sq ft
All-in$360/sq ft

That cost is charged across every converted square foot, including the 30,654 sq ft of windowless core, which has to be gutted, re-plumbed and sprinklered like the rest of the building and then earns nothing. Against it the model sets a completed value of $197K a home, which for 211 homes is $41.5M.

What would have to be true

A $40.8M gap before any grant, $30.8M after the modeled one. The smallest single change that would close it: average unit size 43% down.

The shortfall before any grant is $40.8M. Closing it from the value side means each of the 211 homes finishing at $390K rather than the $197K the model assumes — 98% more. Closing it from the cost side means getting all-in cost down from $360 to $182 per square foot.

A modeled RESIDE grant of $10.0M moves that threshold to $343K a home. That is still above the $197K assumed, leaving $30.8M uncovered, which is why the grant does not unlock this one.

Nor do all four levers have to move. For 325 Chestnut St, one alone would close the gap at:

Single-assumption flip points for 325 Chestnut St, each holding the other three at their defaults.

Average unit sizethe binding constraint — the least this building would need43% downto 430 sq ft
Conversion cost per square foot52% downto $125/sq ft
Completed value per home74% upto $343K

All four are sliders in the survey, where 325 Chestnut St re-scores against your own numbers.

How it compares in Center City Philadelphia

325 Chestnut St ranks 37th of the 103 buildings screened here, against a median score of 67.

Its floor plate is better lit than 61% of them, and shallower than 56% of them at its deepest interior point. On size it is the 53rd largest by estimated homes. The full survey of all 103 buildings ranks and maps every one of them, and the list by address links each to its own page.

Within the CMX4 zone

3rd of 15 zoned CMX4 — the comparison that shares its rules, rents and streets.

15 of the screened buildings are zoned CMX4. 325 Chestnut St ranks 3rd of them against a median score of 58. 5 score 70 or more, their median deepest interior point is 64 ft from a facade against this building’s 52 ft, and together they would hold an estimated 4,016 homes. The group’s top scorer is 901 Arch St, at 84.

Its nearest match in size: 1420 Walnut St

The screened building closest to 325 Chestnut St in converted floor area is 1420 Walnut St: 208,044 sq ft over 15 stories, against 228,576 sq ft over 13 here.

325 Chestnut St scores 80 to its 92, and with the size held roughly equal most of that shortfall comes from interior depth: 70 out of 100 here, 100 there (deepest interior point 38 ft from a facade, scored from 80 ft down to 40 ft). On the money they sit in the same place: each falls short even with the modeled grant. The two stand about 5,100 ft apart.

Would it qualify for a RESIDE Act grant?

The model awards 325 Chestnut St $10.0M, on the assumption it qualifies. Whether it does, no published dataset can say.

That figure assumes the building meets the Act’s vacant-and-abandoned test, which turns on code-enforcement and receivership records no city publishes.

It does not sit in a 2018 designated Opportunity Zone, so it would not draw that Section 201 priority.

Other buildings screened near 325 Chestnut St

The 4 closest the screen also covers, from 340 ft away. They are the colored outlines on the plan at the top of this page.

  • 330 Market St
    4 stories · 77% daylit · 45 estimated homes · scores 53/100 (Worth a feasibility study)
    about 340 ft away
  • 399 Market St
    5 stories · 67% daylit · 80 estimated homes · scores 40/100 (Marginal)
    about 580 ft away
  • 232 Market St
    5 stories · 100% daylit · 39 estimated homes · scores 83/100 (Strong candidate)
    about 620 ft away
  • 101 N Independence Mall E
    11 stories · 63% daylit · 327 estimated homes · scores 46/100 (Marginal)
    about 650 ft away

A screen, not a feasibility study, from outlines and heights rather than plans: the method and how to correct a figure. If you know this building’s interior, you know what this model cannot see.