736 Arch St

736 Arch St is a 7-story building in Center City Philadelphia with 97% of its floor area within daylight reach of a facade. This screen estimates 129 homes and scores it 91 out of 100 for office-to-residential conversion suitability.

PA-2 & PA-3 · Screened 2026-10-04 · Strong candidate

Build a free conversion planCheck its numbers, lay out its homes and get a two-page PDF. Free.

No address point in Philadelphia’s records falls inside this footprint, so it is named by the closest one that no other screened building claims — usually a site entrance, but check the outline on the plan below before relying on the street number.

Where 736 Arch St is

Its block in Center City Philadelphia, drawn from Philadelphia's own building outlines and street centerlines.

801 Arch St: scores 56 out of 100150 N Independence Mall W: scores 25 out of 100701 Market St: scores 15 out of 100561591ARCH STFILBERT STN 7TH STN 8TH STN100 ftCenter City Philadelphia
Suitability score
0–29
30–49
50–69
70–100
  • Already housing
  • Not screened
  • 736 Arch St
736 Arch St and the 1,000 ft of Center City Philadelphia around it. The streets are drawn at the width of the right-of-way they run down, sidewalks included, and named, and every building on these blocks is drawn. What is left open and stippled is neither: a surface lot, a plaza or a vacant parcel. The screened buildings are colored by the ramp above, the same one the district map uses, carry their score, and each is a link to its own page. Each casts a shadow as long as its measured height lets it, so towers stand out from the low buildings around them; the unscreened buildings have no measured height and cast none. 736 Arch St is outlined in its own score color at the outline it covers at ground level. Its windowless core is hatched. The inset places it among every building the screen covers.
39 ftAA100 ftDaylit 97%Core 640 sq ft
Floor plan: 97% of each floor sits within daylight reach of a facade. The shading is daylight, darkest at the windows and gone 35 ft in. The hatched area is windowless core: 640 sq ft per floor that must be renovated but can never be rented as an apartment. The dimension marks the deepest interior point, 39 ft from the nearest window. A–A is where the section beside it is cut.
Ground floor · no homesWindowless coreDaylit7 floors25 ft
Section A–A: cut across the depth of the plate, through the middle of the core. Daylight reaches 35 ft in from every facade, fading as it goes, and the hatched stripe left between the lit edges is floor that gets converted and can never be rented: 640 sq ft on the floor the screen scores, and 3,841 sq ft over 6 residential floors. The shaded ground floor is converted like the rest and counted as no homes.

This building does not pencil at default assumptions, even with a modeled RESIDE Act grant.

Every floor carries 640 sq ft of windowless core — area that must be gutted, re-plumbed and sprinklered but can never be rented as an apartment. Across 6 residential floors that is 3,841 sq ft of cost carrying no revenue.

Modeled conversion metrics for 736 Arch St, 2026-10-04.

Suitability scoreStrong candidate91 / 100
Storiesfrom 119 ft LiDAR height ÷ 12 ft floor-to-floor7
Floor plateper floor, from the city footprint20,865 sq ft
Daylight efficiencyshare within 35 ft of a facade97%
Deepest interior pointviability threshold is 80 ft39 ft
Windowless coreper floor — renovated but never rentable640 sq ft
Estimated homesat 750 sq ft average129
Conversion cost$360/sq ft all-in on 125,191 sq ft$45.1M
Gap before grantshortfall against completed value$19.7M
Modeled RESIDE grantbelow the statutory cap$7.7M
BuiltPhiladelphia's own record of the construction year1881
ZoningCenter City PhiladelphiaCMX5
Opportunity Zonenot in a 2018 designated tractNo

The plan: window line, shape and floor rhythm

34 ft of exterior wall for each home the screen estimates — enough for two- and three-bedroom homes across the plan.

The typical floor has 722 ft of exterior wall, and across 6 residential floors the building carries 4,333 ft of it in total, divided among the 129 homes this screen estimates.

Its plate is moderately compact at 0.50: a squarish plan, with enough perimeter for a conventional double-loaded corridor. How window line and plate shape are measured.

At the model’s 750 sq ft average, the plan works out at about 21.5 homes per floor, repeated on every residential floor, since this building's outline does not change as it rises.

Why 736 Arch St scores 91 out of 100

Daylight efficiency 100, Interior depth 100, Scale 86, Finance 56 — each out of 100, then weighted.

Score components for 736 Arch St. Points are the subscore times its weight.

ComponentSubscoreWeightPoints
Daylight efficiency97% of the floor area within 35 ft of a facade, scored from 40% up to 90%10045%45.0
Interior depthdeepest interior point 39 ft from a facade, scored from 80 ft down to 40 ft10025%25.0
Scale129 estimated homes, scored from 0 up to 1508615%12.9
Financeremaining gap is 27% of conversion cost, scored from 60% down to 0%5615%8.4

Most of what it earns comes from daylight efficiency, and what holds it back most is finance, at 56 out of 100: remaining gap is 27% of conversion cost, scored from 60% down to 0%.

Built in 1881

Philadelphia records this building as going up in 1881, which puts it in the pre-1920 stock.

As a rule, the era that converts most readily: load-bearing masonry, small floor plates laid out before deep-plan offices were possible, operable windows and generous floor-to-floor heights. The usual obstacles are not daylight but hazardous materials, lifts and bringing structure up to current code. That is the era’s general tendency rather than a finding about this building — the model reads an outline and a height, and can see nothing inside — but it is the first thing an architect would want to know, and it colours how much confidence the 97% daylight figure above deserves.

What the conversion would cost

$360 per square foot all-in across 125,191 sq ft of converted floor, or $45.1M in total — about $349K for each of the 129 homes.

All-in cost per square foot for 736 Arch St: base cost plus the code work a change of use triggers.

Base conversion cost$260/sq ft
Plumbing risers to every unit$40/sq ft
Operable windows and glazing$30/sq ft
Additional egress stair$18/sq ft
Fire sprinklers (NFPA 13R)$12/sq ft
All-in$360/sq ft

That cost is charged across every converted square foot, including the 3,841 sq ft of windowless core, which has to be gutted, re-plumbed and sprinklered like the rest of the building and then earns nothing. Against it the model sets a completed value of $197K a home, which for 129 homes is $25.4M.

What would have to be true

A $19.7M gap before any grant, $12.0M after the modeled one. The smallest single change that would close it: average unit size 28% down.

The shortfall before any grant is $19.7M. Closing it from the value side means each of the 129 homes finishing at $349K rather than the $197K the model assumes — 78% more. Closing it from the cost side means getting all-in cost down from $360 to $203 per square foot.

A modeled RESIDE grant of $7.7M moves that threshold to $289K a home. That is still above the $197K assumed, leaving $12.0M uncovered, which is why the grant does not unlock this one.

Nor do all four levers have to move. For 736 Arch St, one alone would close the gap at:

Single-assumption flip points for 736 Arch St, each holding the other three at their defaults.

Average unit sizethe binding constraint — the least this building would need28% downto 542 sq ft
Conversion cost per square foot37% downto $165/sq ft
Completed value per home47% upto $289K

All four are sliders in the survey, where 736 Arch St re-scores against your own numbers.

How it compares in Center City Philadelphia

736 Arch St ranks 11th of the 100 buildings screened here, against a median score of 67.

Its floor plate is better lit than 78% of them, and shallower than 76% of them at its deepest interior point. On size it is the 63rd largest by estimated homes. The full survey of all 100 buildings ranks and maps every one of them, and the list by address links each to its own page.

Within the CMX5 zone

11th of 63 zoned CMX5 — the comparison that shares its rules, rents and streets.

63 of the screened buildings are zoned CMX5. 736 Arch St ranks 11th of them against a median score of 67. 28 score 70 or more, their median deepest interior point is 57 ft from a facade against this building’s 39 ft, and together they would hold an estimated 30,185 homes. The group’s top scorer is 112 N Broad St, at 93.

Its nearest match in size: 990 Spring Garden St

The screened building closest to 736 Arch St in converted floor area is 990 Spring Garden St: 134,550 sq ft over 7 stories, against 125,191 sq ft over 7 here.

736 Arch St scores 91 to its 63, and with the size held roughly equal most of that lead comes from daylight efficiency: 100 out of 100 here, 72 there (76% of the floor area within 35 ft of a facade, scored from 40% up to 90%). On the money they sit in the same place: each falls short even with the modeled grant. The two stand about 3,200 ft apart.

Would it qualify for a RESIDE Act grant?

The model awards 736 Arch St $7.7M, on the assumption it qualifies. Whether it does, no published dataset can say.

That figure assumes the building meets the Act’s vacant-and-abandoned test, which turns on code-enforcement and receivership records no city publishes.

It does not sit in a 2018 designated Opportunity Zone, so it would not draw that Section 201 priority.

Other buildings screened near 736 Arch St

The 4 closest the screen also covers, from 360 ft away. They are the colored outlines on the plan at the top of this page.

  • 701 Market St
    5 stories · 40% daylit · 247 estimated homes · scores 15/100 (Unlikely)
    about 360 ft away
  • 117 N 8th St
    8 stories · 95% daylit · 63 estimated homes · scores 84/100 (Strong candidate)
    about 420 ft away
  • 801 Arch St
    6 stories · 71% daylit · 133 estimated homes · scores 56/100 (Worth a feasibility study)
    about 440 ft away
  • 150 N Independence Mall W
    8 stories · 52% daylit · 407 estimated homes · scores 25/100 (Unlikely)
    about 580 ft away

A screen, not a feasibility study, from outlines and heights rather than plans: the method and how to correct a figure. If you know this building’s interior, you know what this model cannot see.